BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18692221)

  • 1. Use of iron-based technologies in contaminated land and groundwater remediation: a review.
    Cundy AB; Hopkinson L; Whitby RL
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Aug; 400(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 18692221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of nitrate by resin-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron.
    Park H; Park YM; Yoo KM; Lee SH
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2153-7. PubMed ID: 19494454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 1. Hydrogeochemical studies.
    Wilkin RT; Acree SD; Ross RR; Beak DG; Lee TR
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19167133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 2. Geochemical modeling and solid phase studies.
    Beak DG; Wilkin RT
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):15-28. PubMed ID: 19167132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Entrapment of iron nanoparticles in calcium alginate beads for groundwater remediation applications.
    Bezbaruah AN; Krajangpan S; Chisholm BJ; Khan E; Bermudez JJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):1339-43. PubMed ID: 19178997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental benefits and risks of zero-valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI) for in situ remediation: risk mitigation or trade-off?
    Grieger KD; Fjordbøge A; Hartmann NB; Eriksson E; Bjerg PL; Baun A
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Nov; 118(3-4):165-83. PubMed ID: 20813426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In situ testing of metallic iron nanoparticle mobility and reactivity in a shallow granular aquifer.
    Bennett P; He F; Zhao D; Aiken B; Feldman L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jul; 116(1-4):35-46. PubMed ID: 20542350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Process optimization in use of zero valent iron nanoparticles for oxidative transformations.
    Mylon SE; Sun Q; Waite TD
    Chemosphere; 2010 Sep; 81(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 20619873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zerovalent iron encapsulated chitosan nanospheres - a novel adsorbent for the removal of total inorganic arsenic from aqueous systems.
    Gupta A; Yunus M; Sankararamakrishnan N
    Chemosphere; 2012 Jan; 86(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 22079302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of zero-valent iron as a permeable reactive barrier for long-term removal of arsenic compounds from synthetic water.
    Lee KJ; Lee Y; Yoon J; Kamala-Kannan S; Park SM; Oh BT
    Environ Technol; 2009 Dec; 30(13):1425-34. PubMed ID: 20088207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remediation of alachlor and atrazine contaminated water with zero-valent iron nanoparticles.
    Bezbaruah AN; Thompson JM; Chisholm BJ
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2009 Aug; 44(6):518-24. PubMed ID: 20183057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Zero-valent iron nanoparticles in treatment of acid mine water from in situ uranium leaching.
    Klimkova S; Cernik M; Lacinova L; Filip J; Jancik D; Zboril R
    Chemosphere; 2011 Feb; 82(8):1178-84. PubMed ID: 21193219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of atrazine by nanoscale zero valent iron supported on organobentonite.
    Zhang Y; Li Y; Zheng X
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):625-30. PubMed ID: 21093019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preparation and evaluation of iron-chitosan composites for removal of As(III) and As(V) from arsenic contaminated real life groundwater.
    Gupta A; Chauhan VS; Sankararamakrishnan N
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3862-70. PubMed ID: 19577786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of zero-valent iron for groundwater remediation and wastewater treatment: a review.
    Fu F; Dionysiou DD; Liu H
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Feb; 267():194-205. PubMed ID: 24457611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water.
    Giles DE; Mohapatra M; Issa TB; Anand S; Singh P
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Dec; 92(12):3011-22. PubMed ID: 21871703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lab-scale simulation of the fate and transport of nano zero-valent iron in subsurface environments: aggregation, sedimentation, and contaminant desorption.
    Yin K; Lo IM; Dong H; Rao P; Mak MS
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 227-228():118-25. PubMed ID: 22633881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetite and zero-valent iron nanoparticles for the remediation of uranium contaminated environmental water.
    Crane RA; Dickinson M; Popescu IC; Scott TB
    Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(9):2931-42. PubMed ID: 21470652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Batch-test study on the dechlorination of 1,1,1-trichloroethane in contaminated aquifer material by zero-valent iron.
    Lookman R; Bastiaens L; Borremans B; Maesen M; Gemoets J; Diels L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Oct; 74(1-4):133-44. PubMed ID: 15358490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Remediation of inorganic arsenic in groundwater for safe water supply: a critical assessment of technological solutions.
    Mondal P; Bhowmick S; Chatterjee D; Figoli A; Van der Bruggen B
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jun; 92(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 23466274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.