282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18692296)
1. Examination of inertial cavitation of Optison in producing sonoporation of chinese hamster ovary cells.
Forbes MM; Steinberg RL; O'Brien WD
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2009-18. PubMed ID: 18692296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency-dependent evaluation of the role of definity in producing sonoporation of Chinese hamster ovary cells.
Forbes MM; Steinberg RL; O'Brien WD
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Jan; 30(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 21193706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluorescein isothiocynate-dextran uptake by chinese hamster ovary cells in a 1.5 MHz ultrasonic standing wave in the presence of contrast agent.
Khanna S; Hudson B; Pepper CJ; Amso NN; Coakley WT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 32(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 16464674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a theoretical model describing sonoporation activity of cells exposed to ultrasound in the presence of contrast agents.
Forbes MM; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2723-9. PubMed ID: 22501051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transfection effect of microbubbles on cells in superposed ultrasound waves and behavior of cavitation bubble.
Kodama T; Tomita Y; Koshiyama K; Blomley MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):905-14. PubMed ID: 16785012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison.
Chen WS; Brayman AA; Matula TJ; Crum LA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 May; 29(5):725-37. PubMed ID: 12754072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatiotemporal effects of sonoporation measured by real-time calcium imaging.
Kumon RE; Aehle M; Sabens D; Parikh P; Han YW; Kourennyi D; Deng CX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):494-506. PubMed ID: 19010589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inertial cavitation dose produced in ex vivo rabbit ear arteries with Optison by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound.
Tu J; Matula TJ; Brayman AA; Crum LA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 32(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 16464673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability.
Lai CY; Wu CH; Chen CC; Li PC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1931-41. PubMed ID: 17169705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonoporation of cultured cells in the rotating tube exposure system.
Miller DL; Bao S; Morris JE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Jan; 25(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 10048811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Control of Acoustic Cavitation for Efficient Sonoporation with Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.
Burgess MT; Porter TM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):846-858. PubMed ID: 30638968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancement of non-invasive trans-membrane drug delivery using ultrasound and microbubbles during physiologically relevant flow.
Shamout FE; Pouliopoulos AN; Lee P; Bonaccorsi S; Towhidi L; Krams R; Choi JJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2435-48. PubMed ID: 26067786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The pulse length-dependence of inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis.
Chen WS; Brayman AA; Matula TJ; Crum LA; Miller MW
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 May; 29(5):739-48. PubMed ID: 12754073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.
Ammi AY; Cleveland RO; Mamou J; Wang GI; Bridal SL; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jan; 53(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 16471439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species in Heterogeneously Sonoporated Cells by Microbubbles with Single-Pulse Ultrasound.
Jia C; Xu L; Han T; Cai P; Yu ACH; Qin P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 May; 44(5):1074-1085. PubMed ID: 29499918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental study of the effects of Optison concentration on sonoporation in vitro.
Ward M; Wu J; Chiu JF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 26(7):1169-75. PubMed ID: 11053752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.
Radhakrishnan K; Bader KB; Haworth KJ; Kopechek JA; Raymond JL; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6541-63. PubMed ID: 24002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of the dynamic activities of a population of microbubbles driven by pulsed ultrasound exposure in sonoporation.
Fan Z; Chen D; Deng CX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1260-72. PubMed ID: 24486236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Long-Term Fate of the Sonoporated Pancreatic Cancer Cells is Uncorrelated With the Degree of Model Molecular Loading.
Lin L; Cheng M; Wu R; Shi Q; Du L; Qin P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 46(4):1015-1025. PubMed ID: 31932158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability.
Karshafian R; Bevan PD; Williams R; Samac S; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):847-60. PubMed ID: 19110370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
