These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18692658)

  • 1. A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning?
    Guenzinger R; Eichinger WB; Hettich I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka D; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18692658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Wagner IM; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2054-60. PubMed ID: 15963409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the new mechanical bileaflet Sorin Bicarbon valve prosthesis compared with St. Jude Medical].
    Badano L; Carratino L; De Gaetano G; Piazza R; Calisi P; Passerone G; Lucatti A
    G Ital Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 24(6):733-43. PubMed ID: 8088472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position.
    Jaffe WM; Coverdale HA; Roche AH; Whitlock RM; Neutze JM; Barratt-Boyes BG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Aug; 100(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 2385114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of different mechanical prostheses suitable for replacement of the systemic atrioventricular valve in children.
    Bottio T; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Rizzoli G; Tarzia V; Buratto E; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 21890150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary perfusion: impact of flow dynamics and geometric design of 2 different aortic prostheses of similar size.
    Mannacio V; Di Tommaso L; De Amicis V; Stassano P; Vosa C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1030-5. PubMed ID: 21752400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transvalvular in vivo gradients of the new generation bileaflet heart valve prosthesis St. Jude Medical Regent in aortic position.
    Südkamp M; Lercher AJ; Müller-Riemenschneider F; LaRosee K; Tossios P; Mehlhorn U; de Vivie ER
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Jun; 51(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 12833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients.
    Chambers JB; Rimington HM; Hodson F; Rajani R; Blauth CI
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):878-2. PubMed ID: 16580447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Replacement of the st jude medical regent valve in the aortic position with a continuous suture technique in the small aortic root.
    Wu Z; Cao H; Zhu D; Wang Q; Wang D
    J Card Surg; 2014 Mar; 29(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 24131494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Wagner I; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 53(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 16037868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing options for the small aortic root.
    Petracek MR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S50-5. PubMed ID: 11843521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of mechanical and biological aortic valve replacement on coronary perfusion: a prospective, randomized study.
    Bakhtiary F; Abolmaali N; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-11; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 16480006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly.
    Roscitano A; Benedetto U; Sciangula A; Merico E; Barberi F; Bianchini R; Tonelli E; Sinatra R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 29(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16376565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Influence of primary lesion, valvular type, valvular size, and left ventricular function.
    Tatineni S; Barner HB; Pearson AC; Halbe D; Woodruff R; Labovitz AJ
    Circulation; 1989 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):I16-23. PubMed ID: 2766522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses.
    Ruzicka DJ; Hettich I; Hutter A; Bleiziffer S; Badiu CC; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R; Eichinger WB
    Circulation; 2009 Sep; 120(11 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 19752359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of small-size Sorin Slimline and St. Jude HP heart valve prostheses.
    Otero E; Pomar JL; Revuelta JM; Rufilanchas JJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1284-90. PubMed ID: 15797063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.