408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18692761)
1. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.
Cooper VF; Goodhartz LA; Nemcek AA; Ryu RK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18692761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Part I: preparing first-year radiology residents and assessing their readiness for on-call responsibilities.
Ganguli S; Pedrosa I; Yam CS; Appignani B; Siewert B; Kressel HY
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):764-9. PubMed ID: 16679280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting attending agreement with resident early readings of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the head, neck, and spine.
Sistrom C; Deitte L
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):934-41. PubMed ID: 18572131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies.
Filippi CG; Schneider B; Burbank HN; Alsofrom GF; Linnell G; Ratkovits B
Radiology; 2008 Dec; 249(3):972-9. PubMed ID: 19011191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.
Ruutiainen AT; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Sep; 8(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 21889753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.
Chung JH; Strigel RM; Chew AR; Albrecht E; Gunn ML
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1155-60. PubMed ID: 19481962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of the RADPEER™ scoring language to interpretation discrepancies between diagnostic radiology residents and faculty radiologists.
Maloney E; Lomasney LM; Schomer L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Apr; 9(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 22469377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight.
Ruutiainen AT; Durand DJ; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
Acad Radiol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 23452475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-sectional examination interpretation discrepancies between on-call diagnostic radiology residents and subspecialty faculty radiologists: analysis by imaging modality and subspecialty.
Ruma J; Klein KA; Chong S; Wesolowski J; Kazerooni EA; Ellis JH; Myles JD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jun; 8(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 21636055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary reports in the emergency department: is a subspecialist radiologist more accurate than a radiology resident?
Branstetter BF; Morgan MB; Nesbit CE; Phillips JA; Lionetti DM; Chang PJ; Towers JD
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 17236993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using a web-based application to enhance resident training and improve performance on-call.
Itri JN; Redfern RO; Scanlon MH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):917-20. PubMed ID: 20447839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors involved in discrepant preliminary radiology resident interpretations of neuroradiological imaging studies: a retrospective analysis.
Bruni SG; Bartlett E; Yu E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1367-74. PubMed ID: 22623550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy.
Weinberg BD; Richter MD; Champine JG; Morriss MC; Browning T
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jan; 12(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 25557573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On-call musculoskeletal radiographs: discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists.
Kung JW; Melenevsky Y; Hochman MG; Didolkar MM; Yablon CM; Eisenberg RL; Wu JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):856-9. PubMed ID: 23521460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do telephone call interruptions have an impact on radiology resident diagnostic accuracy?
Balint BJ; Steenburg SD; Lin H; Shen C; Steele JL; Gunderman RB
Acad Radiol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1623-8. PubMed ID: 25281360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of work hours, caseload, shift type, and experience on resident call performance.
Davenport MS; Ellis JH; Khalatbari SH; Myles JD; Klein KA
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):921-7. PubMed ID: 20540912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On-Call Radiology Resident Discrepancies: Categorization by Patient Location and Severity.
Mellnick V; Raptis C; McWilliams S; Picus D; Wahl R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27319372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using focused missed-case conferences to reduce discrepancies in musculoskeletal studies interpreted by residents on call.
Itri JN; Kang HC; Krishnan S; Nathan D; Scanlon MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):W696-705. PubMed ID: 21940542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
