536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18692781)
1. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study.
Rama Raju GA; Jaya Prakash G; Murali Krishna K; Madan K
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 18692781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers.
Shi W; Xue X; Zhang S; Zhao W; Liu S; Zhou H; Wang M; Shi J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Jun; 97(6):1338-42. PubMed ID: 22464083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using cryoloop: a 4-year follow-up study.
Takahashi K; Mukaida T; Goto T; Oka C
Fertil Steril; 2005 Jul; 84(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 16009162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
Kahraman S; Candan ZN
Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.
Roy TK; Bradley CK; Bowman MC; McArthur SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24582521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer.
Kato O; Kawasaki N; Bodri D; Kuroda T; Kawachiya S; Kato K; Takehara Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22200255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer.
Belva F; Bonduelle M; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Van Landuyt L
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1610-20. PubMed ID: 27165622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic analysis of human embryos by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) improves efficiency of IVF by increasing embryo implantation rate and reducing multiple pregnancies and spontaneous miscarriages.
Sher G; Keskintepe L; Keskintepe M; Maassarani G; Tortoriello D; Brody S
Fertil Steril; 2009 Dec; 92(6):1886-94. PubMed ID: 19135663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.
Cobo A; de los Santos MJ; Castellò D; Gámiz P; Campos P; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1138-46.e1. PubMed ID: 22862909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application.
Liebermann J; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 16762345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vitrification of oocytes produces high pregnancy rates when carried out in fertile women.
Kim TJ; Laufer LR; Hong SW
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 19217099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.
Riggs R; Mayer J; Dowling-Lacey D; Chi TF; Jones E; Oehninger S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19027110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transfer of blastocysts and morulae on day 5.
Wilson M; Hartke K; Kiehl M; Rodgers J; Brabec C; Lyles R
Fertil Steril; 2004 Aug; 82(2):327-33. PubMed ID: 15302279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cryopreservation of human embryos at the morula stage and outcomes after transfer.
Tao J; Craig RH; Johnson M; Williams B; Lewis W; White J; Buehler N
Fertil Steril; 2004 Jul; 82(1):108-18. PubMed ID: 15236998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of pregnancies issued from frozen embryo transfers and pregnancies issued from fresh embryo transfers in fertilization in vitro. FIVNAT].
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1994 May; 22(5):287-91. PubMed ID: 8032380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival rate of human oocytes and pregnancy outcome after vitrification using slush nitrogen in assisted reproductive technologies.
Yoon TK; Lee DR; Cha SK; Chung HM; Lee WS; Cha KY
Fertil Steril; 2007 Oct; 88(4):952-6. PubMed ID: 17350007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
