113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18694013)
1. Assessing a Bayesian risk prediction model in a high-risk breast cancer population.
Chun J; Schnabel F; Ogunyemi O
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():913. PubMed ID: 18694013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer risk prediction in women aged 35-50 years: impact of including sex hormone concentrations in the Gail model.
Clendenen TV; Ge W; Koenig KL; Afanasyeva Y; Agnoli C; Brinton LA; Darvishian F; Dorgan JF; Eliassen AH; Falk RT; Hallmans G; Hankinson SE; Hoffman-Bolton J; Key TJ; Krogh V; Nichols HB; Sandler DP; Schoemaker MJ; Sluss PM; Sund M; Swerdlow AJ; Visvanathan K; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A; Liu M
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Mar; 21(1):42. PubMed ID: 30890167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail in Breast Cancer Screening in Jiangxi Province, China.
Zhang L; Jie Z; Xu S; Zhang L; Guo X
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Aug; 24():5528-5532. PubMed ID: 30089770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women by hormone receptor status.
Chlebowski RT; Anderson GL; Lane DS; Aragaki AK; Rohan T; Yasmeen S; Sarto G; Rosenberg CA; Hubbell FA;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1695-705. PubMed ID: 18000216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic variants improve breast cancer risk prediction on mammograms.
Liu J; Page D; Nassif H; Shavlik J; Peissig P; McCarty C; Onitilo AA; Burnside E
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2013; 2013():876-85. PubMed ID: 24551380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatiotemporal Bayesian networks for malaria prediction.
Haddawy P; Hasan AHMI; Kasantikul R; Lawpoolsri S; Sa-Angchai P; Kaewkungwal J; Singhasivanon P
Artif Intell Med; 2018 Jan; 84():127-138. PubMed ID: 29241658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective validation of the NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail Model) on 40,000 Australian women.
Nickson C; Procopio P; Velentzis LS; Carr S; Devereux L; Mann GB; James P; Lee G; Wellard C; Campbell I
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):155. PubMed ID: 30572910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Convolutional Neural Network Using a Breast MRI Tumor Dataset Can Predict Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score.
Ha R; Chang P; Mutasa S; Karcich J; Goodman S; Blum E; Kalinsky K; Liu MZ; Jambawalikar S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):518-524. PubMed ID: 30129697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis of high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI in the classification of breast lesions.
Bhooshan N; Giger M; Medved M; Li H; Wood A; Yuan Y; Lan L; Marquez A; Karczmar G; Newstead G
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jan; 39(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 24023011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients Using Artificial and Bayesian Neural Networks.
Korhani Kangi A; Bahrampour A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):487-490. PubMed ID: 29480983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Logistic Regression and Bayesian Networks for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer Recurrence.
Witteveen A; Nane GF; Vliegen IMH; Siesling S; IJzerman MJ
Med Decis Making; 2018 Oct; 38(7):822-833. PubMed ID: 30132386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: New Insight Using Receiver Operating Curve Indices and Bayesian Network Analysis.
Zador Z; Sperrin M; King AT
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158762. PubMed ID: 27388421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Training with Small Medical Data: Robust Bayesian Neural Networks for Colon Cancer Overall Survival Prediction.
Hsu TC; Lin C
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():2030-2033. PubMed ID: 34891686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for Women in Nigeria.
Wang S; Ogundiran T; Ademola A; Olayiwola OA; Adeoye A; Sofoluwe A; Morhason-Bello I; Odedina S; Agwai I; Adebamowo C; Obajimi M; Ojengbede O; Olopade OI; Huo D
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Jun; 27(6):636-643. PubMed ID: 29678902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter external validation of two malignancy risk prediction models in patients undergoing 18F-FDG-PET for solitary pulmonary nodule evaluation.
Perandini S; Soardi GA; Larici AR; Del Ciello A; Rizzardi G; Solazzo A; Mancino L; Zeraj F; Bernhart M; Signorini M; Motton M; Montemezzi S
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):2042-2046. PubMed ID: 27631108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the value of mammographic features and genetic variants in breast cancer risk prediction.
Wu Y; Liu J; Page D; Peissig P; McCarty C; Onitilo AA; Burnside ES
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2014; 2014():1228-37. PubMed ID: 25954434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing breast cancer risk models in Marin County, a population with high rates of delayed childbirth.
Powell M; Jamshidian F; Cheyne K; Nititham J; Prebil LA; Ereman R
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Jun; 14(3):212-220.e1. PubMed ID: 24461459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of multivariate probabilistic (Bayesian) networks to substance use disorder risk stratification and cost estimation.
Weinstein L; Radano TA; Jack T; Kalina P; Eberhardt JS
Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2009 Sep; 6(Fall):1b. PubMed ID: 20169014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction models for platinum-based chemotherapy response and toxicity in advanced NSCLC patients.
Yin JY; Li X; Li XP; Xiao L; Zheng W; Chen J; Mao CX; Fang C; Cui JJ; Guo CX; Zhang W; Gao Y; Zhang CF; Chen ZH; Zhou H; Zhou HH; Liu ZQ
Cancer Lett; 2016 Jul; 377(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27126360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting sustainable arsenic mitigation using machine learning techniques.
Singh SK; Taylor RW; Pradhan B; Shirzadi A; Pham BT
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Mar; 232():113271. PubMed ID: 35121252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
