These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1869443)

  • 1. The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.
    Oleske DM; Glandon GL; Giacomelli GJ; Hohmann SF
    Health Serv Res; 1991 Aug; 26(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 1869443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990.
    Taffel SM
    Vital Health Stat 21 Data Natal Marriage Divorce; 1994 May; (51):1-24. PubMed ID: 8049307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital.
    Iglesias S; Burn R; Saunders LD
    CMAJ; 1991 Dec; 145(11):1459-64. PubMed ID: 1959105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
    Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do all hospitals need cesarean delivery capability? An outcomes study of maternity care in a rural hospital without on-site cesarean capability.
    Leeman L; Leeman R
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Feb; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Births: final data for 2001.
    Martin JA; Hamilton BE; Ventura SJ; Menacker F; Park MM; Sutton PD
    Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2002 Dec; 51(2):1-102. PubMed ID: 12596439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 15738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.
    Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
    Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery.
    Foley ME; Alarab M; Daly L; Keane D; Rath A; O'herlihy C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):891-5. PubMed ID: 15467560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.