BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18694777)

  • 21. Emotionally arousing pictures increase blood glucose levels and enhance recall.
    Blake TM; Varnhagen CK; Parent MB
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2001 May; 75(3):262-73. PubMed ID: 11300733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Mitchell JF; Stoner GR; Reynolds JH
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6990):410-3. PubMed ID: 15164062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Eye dominance effects in feature search.
    Shneor E; Hochstein S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4258-69. PubMed ID: 17014886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory.
    Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(21):2741-50. PubMed ID: 17764714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry is prolonged by a dynamic surround.
    Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K
    Vision Res; 2013 Nov; 92():33-8. PubMed ID: 24041849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures.
    Nummenmaa L; Hyönä J; Calvo MG
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 16768558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Directed attention reduces processing of emotional distracters irrespective of valence and arousal level.
    Wiens S; Syrjänen E
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 23669534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determinants of the vividness of visual imagery: the effects of delayed recall, stimulus affect and individual differences.
    Bywaters M; Andrade J; Turpin G
    Memory; 2004 Jul; 12(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 15487543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Valence interacts with the early ERP old/new effect and arousal with the sustained ERP old/new effect for affective pictures.
    Van Strien JW; Langeslag SJ; Strekalova NJ; Gootjes L; Franken IH
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():223-35. PubMed ID: 19063866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Positive erotic picture stimuli for emotion research in heterosexual females.
    Jacob GA; Arntz A; Domes G; Reiss N; Siep N
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Dec; 190(2-3):348-51. PubMed ID: 21696831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry.
    Brascamp JW; Knapen TH; Kanai R; van Ee R; van den Berg AV
    J Vis; 2007 Sep; 7(12):12.1-12. PubMed ID: 17997654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures.
    Hajcak G; Moser JS; Simons RF
    Emotion; 2006 Aug; 6(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 16938092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Caloric vestibular stimulation reveals discrete neural mechanisms for coherence rivalry and eye rivalry: a meta-rivalry model.
    Ngo TT; Liu GB; Tilley AJ; Pettigrew JD; Miller SM
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(21):2685-99. PubMed ID: 17719618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mountains and valleys: binocular rivalry and the flow of experience.
    Cosmelli D; Thompson E
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Sep; 16(3):623-41; discussion 642-4. PubMed ID: 17804257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of visual sexual content on the event-related potential.
    van Lankveld JJ; Smulders FT
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 18541359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Percept-switch nucleation in binocular rivalry reveals local adaptation characteristics of early visual processing.
    van Ee R
    J Vis; 2011 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 21343327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gaze differences in processing pictures with emotional content.
    Budimir S; Palmović M
    Coll Antropol; 2011 Jan; 35 Suppl 1():17-23. PubMed ID: 21648306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognition memory for pictorial stimuli: biasing effects of stimulus emotionality.
    Fernández-Rey J; Redondo J
    Psicothema; 2007 Aug; 19(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 17617973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanisms selectively engaged in rivalry: normal vision habituates, rivalrous vision primes.
    Pearson J; Clifford CW
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):707-14. PubMed ID: 15639497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.