219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18694896)
1. Accuracy and completeness of electronic patient records in primary care.
Majeed A; Car J; Sheikh A
Fam Pract; 2008 Aug; 25(4):213-4. PubMed ID: 18694896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A new quality improvement study every day? Using QTools to build quality improvement projects around primary care electronic medical record systems.
Treweek S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1106-9. PubMed ID: 15360984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electronic clinical records: what do regulators want?
Zuber RF
Home Care Manag; 1998; 2(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 10409938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. EMRs for improving quality of care: promise and pitfalls.
Gill JM
Fam Med; 2009; 41(7):513-5. PubMed ID: 19582638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assurance in radiotherapy. How to improve the effectiveness and completeness of an electronic patient's chart.
Portaluri M; Casciaro S; Bambace S; Tramacere F; Casciaro E; Recchia V; Sanzo A; Pili G; Didonna V; Distante A
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2005; 41(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 16569919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using electronic health records to measure physician performance for acute conditions in primary care: empirical evaluation of the community-acquired pneumonia clinical quality measure set.
Linder JA; Kaleba EO; Kmetik KS
Med Care; 2009 Feb; 47(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 19169122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The future of electronic medical records--part I.
Fackler J
Mo Med; 2006; 103(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 16703707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Operational supports to improve adherence: strategies from the field.
Arena JK
JAAPA; 2004 Nov; 17(11):29-31. PubMed ID: 15575521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legibility, accuracy, specificity vital in records.
Johnson LJ
Med Econ; 2010 May; 87(10):40. PubMed ID: 20632653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nursing documentation for communicating and evaluating care.
Törnvall E; Wilhelmsson S
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2116-24. PubMed ID: 18710374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Where research and practice meet.
Terry K
Med Econ; 2006 Jun; 83(11):47-50. PubMed ID: 16827533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [EDP in primary health care].
Maartmann-Moe K
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(10):1202-3. PubMed ID: 8493644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Electronic patient records in primary care: study has serious flaw.
Shaw NT
BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7415):622; author reply 622. PubMed ID: 12969949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Single-stranded electronic medical record--paradigmatic shift that has failed to appear].
Munck LK
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Feb; 171(8):589. PubMed ID: 19284900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The patient centred medical home - a new model of practice in the USA.
Kellerman R
Aust Fam Physician; 2009 May; 38(5):279. PubMed ID: 19458794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record.
Roth CP; Lim YW; Pevnick JM; Asch SM; McGlynn EA
Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 19482968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Time, medical records and quality assurance--the cost-benefit assessment is a must].
Ericsson M
Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(18):2245-6. PubMed ID: 10850056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [A dynamic medical record is invaluable for high-quality care].
Tiselius HG; Karlsson M; Thunblad K
Lakartidningen; 2002 Oct; 99(43):4280-2. PubMed ID: 12448317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Electronic health records--at what cost to care?
Belsky DH
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2009 May; 109(5):255-6. PubMed ID: 19451257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Central registries in health care. Are they reliable?].
Carlsson P
Lakartidningen; 1994 Feb; 91(7):582, 587. PubMed ID: 8114593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
