These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18695021)

  • 1. The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions.
    Richie C; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1607-19. PubMed ID: 18695021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.
    Stacey PC; Summerfield AQ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 18367694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of training on speech recognition performance in noise using lexically hard words.
    Burk MH; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 17344546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2521904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers.
    Iverson P; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):866-77. PubMed ID: 19640051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants.
    Chang YP; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1331-41. PubMed ID: 17197499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.
    Nogaki G; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17496666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-modal integration during vowel identification in audiovisual speech: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Murase M; Saito DN; Kochiyama T; Tanabe HC; Tanaka S; Harada T; Aramaki Y; Honda M; Sadato N
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 18280656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bimodal audio-visual training enhances auditory adaptation process.
    Kawase T; Sakamoto S; Hori Y; Maki A; Suzuki Y; Kobayashi T
    Neuroreport; 2009 Sep; 20(14):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19629016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiovisual perception of speech in noise and masked written text.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18091101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
    Xu L; Zheng Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.