These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18696020)

  • 21. [The Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in noise].
    Winkler A; Holube I; Husstedt H
    HNO; 2020 Jan; 68(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 31598771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustical changes of loudly spoken speech and their effects on speech recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tschopp K; Käser H; Kunert F
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Jun; 26(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 1393153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Evaluation of the Oldenburg children's rhyme test in silence and in noise].
    Wagener KC; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2006 Mar; 54(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 16132880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Hearing loss determination and assessment of the reduction in earning capacity taking speech discrimination tests in noise into account].
    Thiele C; Sukowski H; Wagener K; Kollmeier B; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    HNO; 2011 Nov; 59(11):1111-7. PubMed ID: 21959774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Possibilities and limits of speech audiometry in non-German speaking foreigners].
    Pazdzierniak B
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Jul; 67(7):326-30. PubMed ID: 3210861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of Lexical Parameters and Audibility on the Recognition of the Freiburg Monosyllabic Speech Test.
    Winkler A; Carroll R; Holube I
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 31033700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?
    Uslar V; Ruigendijk E; Hamann C; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):621-31. PubMed ID: 21714708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Sauer's binaural number test in noise. Significance in expertise].
    Braun T; Leisering B; Krause E; Schorn K; Hempel JM
    HNO; 2012 Oct; 60(10):886-91. PubMed ID: 22767194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].
    Müller A; Hocke T; Hoppe U; Mir-Salim P
    HNO; 2016 Mar; 64(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 26801889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A preliminary study on speech recognition in noise training for children with hearing loss.
    Zhang M; Moncrieff D; Johnston D; Parfitt M; Auld R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 149():110843. PubMed ID: 34340007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The speech audiometry using the matrix sentence test].
    Boboshko MY; Zhilinskaia EV; Warzybok A; Maltseva NV; Zokoll M; Kollmeier B
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2016; 81(5):40-44. PubMed ID: 27876736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Extended indications for cochlear implantation. The Freiburg results in patients with residual hearing].
    Klenzner T; Stecker M; Marangos N; Laszig R
    HNO; 1999 Feb; 47(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 10197275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.
    Beattie RC; Raffin MJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 3990262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.