These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18696156)
1. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients. Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183. Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ; J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer. Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early-stage cervical cancer. Zhang W; Zhang J; Yang J; Xue H; Cao D; Huang H; Wu M; Cui Q; Chen J; Lang J; Shen K Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1292-8. PubMed ID: 24987919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center. Yang E; Huang S; Ran X; Huang Y; Li Z BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33639874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in early-stage cervical carcinoma. Yu L; Jia C; Wang X; Lu P; Tian M; Wang W; Lou G Am J Med Sci; 2011 Feb; 341(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 21030858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Value of CT scanning in the diagnosis of early cervical carcinoma]. Dai JR; Zhang X; Jiang LX; Li J; Zhang J Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 28(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 16750026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of 3.0Tesla diffusion-weighted MRI for pelvic nodal staging in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Klerkx WM; Veldhuis WB; Spijkerboer AM; van den Bosch MA; Mali WP; Heintz AP; Bipat S; Sie-Go DM; van der Velden J; Schreuder HW; Stoker J; Peeters PH Eur J Cancer; 2012 Dec; 48(18):3414-21. PubMed ID: 22835781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings. Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer. Park W; Park YJ; Huh SJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee J; Kim BH; Choi JY; Ahn YC; Lim DH Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 35(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15886267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic results of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients treated for stage IB2/II cervical cancer with negative [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in the para-aortic area. Boughanim M; Leboulleux S; Rey A; Pham CT; Zafrani Y; Duvillard P; Lumbroso J; Haie-Meder C; Schlumberger M; Morice P J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(15):2558-61. PubMed ID: 18487573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can preoperative MRI accurately evaluate nodal and parametrial invasion in early stage cervical cancer? Chung HH; Kang SB; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Lee HP Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 May; 37(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 17556538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT and ultra low field (0.02 T) MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma. Varpula M; Kilholma P; Klemi P Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8011386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma. Walsh JW; Goplerud DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Nov; 137(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 6975028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]