570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18697539)
1. Incorporating geometric ray tracing to generate initial conditions for intensity modulated arc therapy optimization.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Craig J; Chen J; Wong E
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3137-50. PubMed ID: 18697539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of optimization strategies and the effect of initial conditions on IMAT optimization using a leaf position optimization algorithm.
Oliver M; Jensen M; Chen J; Wong E
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3543-61. PubMed ID: 19454783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. IMAT-SIM: a new method for the clinical dosimetry of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT).
Iori M; Cagni E; Nahum AE; Borasi G
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2759-73. PubMed ID: 17821983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Segmentation and leaf sequencing for intensity modulated arc therapy.
Gladwish A; Oliver M; Craig J; Chen J; Bauman G; Fisher B; Wong E
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1779-88. PubMed ID: 17555259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Leaf-sequencing for intensity-modulated arc therapy using graph algorithms.
Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Chen DZ; Shepard DM; Yu CX
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18293562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Cao D; Holmes TW; Afghan MK; Shepard DM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 17707278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total-variation regularization based inverse planning for intensity modulated arc therapy.
Zhu L; Niu T; Choi K; Xing L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 11(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 22335409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inverse planning for intensity-modulated arc therapy using direct aperture optimization.
Earl MA; Shepard DM; Naqvi S; Li XA; Yu CX
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(8):1075-89. PubMed ID: 12741503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer.
Berwouts D; Olteanu LA; Speleers B; Duprez F; Madani I; Vercauteren T; De Neve W; De Gersem W
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():52. PubMed ID: 27039294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sci-Fri PM: Planning-03: Fundamental understanding of the inter-relation of arc range, angular dose rate and MLC leaf position optimization of Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy for a concave target.
Oliver M; Chen J; Wong E
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part3):3412. PubMed ID: 28512900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving IMRT-plan quality with MLC leaf position refinement post plan optimization.
Niu Y; Zhang G; Berman BL; Parke WC; Yi B; Yu CX
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5118-26. PubMed ID: 22894437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-step intensity modulated arc therapy (2-step IMAT) with segment weight and width optimization.
Sun J; Chew TY; Meyer J
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Jun; 6():57. PubMed ID: 21631957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MCTP system model based on linear programming optimization of apertures obtained from sequencing patient image data maps.
Ureba A; Salguero FJ; Barbeiro AR; Jimenez-Ortega E; Baeza JA; Miras H; Linares R; Perucha M; Leal A
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081719. PubMed ID: 25086529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
