These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

569 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18697539)

  • 1. Incorporating geometric ray tracing to generate initial conditions for intensity modulated arc therapy optimization.
    Oliver M; Gladwish A; Craig J; Chen J; Wong E
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3137-50. PubMed ID: 18697539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
    Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
    Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of optimization strategies and the effect of initial conditions on IMAT optimization using a leaf position optimization algorithm.
    Oliver M; Jensen M; Chen J; Wong E
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3543-61. PubMed ID: 19454783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IMAT-SIM: a new method for the clinical dosimetry of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT).
    Iori M; Cagni E; Nahum AE; Borasi G
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2759-73. PubMed ID: 17821983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
    Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries.
    Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segmentation and leaf sequencing for intensity modulated arc therapy.
    Gladwish A; Oliver M; Craig J; Chen J; Bauman G; Fisher B; Wong E
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1779-88. PubMed ID: 17555259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
    Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Leaf-sequencing for intensity-modulated arc therapy using graph algorithms.
    Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Chen DZ; Shepard DM; Yu CX
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18293562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy.
    Cao D; Holmes TW; Afghan MK; Shepard DM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 17707278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total-variation regularization based inverse planning for intensity modulated arc therapy.
    Zhu L; Niu T; Choi K; Xing L
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 11(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 22335409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inverse planning for intensity-modulated arc therapy using direct aperture optimization.
    Earl MA; Shepard DM; Naqvi S; Li XA; Yu CX
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(8):1075-89. PubMed ID: 12741503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer.
    Berwouts D; Olteanu LA; Speleers B; Duprez F; Madani I; Vercauteren T; De Neve W; De Gersem W
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():52. PubMed ID: 27039294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sci-Fri PM: Planning-03: Fundamental understanding of the inter-relation of arc range, angular dose rate and MLC leaf position optimization of Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy for a concave target.
    Oliver M; Chen J; Wong E
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part3):3412. PubMed ID: 28512900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving IMRT-plan quality with MLC leaf position refinement post plan optimization.
    Niu Y; Zhang G; Berman BL; Parke WC; Yi B; Yu CX
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5118-26. PubMed ID: 22894437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-step intensity modulated arc therapy (2-step IMAT) with segment weight and width optimization.
    Sun J; Chew TY; Meyer J
    Radiat Oncol; 2011 Jun; 6():57. PubMed ID: 21631957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
    Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MCTP system model based on linear programming optimization of apertures obtained from sequencing patient image data maps.
    Ureba A; Salguero FJ; Barbeiro AR; Jimenez-Ortega E; Baeza JA; Miras H; Linares R; Perucha M; Leal A
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081719. PubMed ID: 25086529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.