133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18697665)
1. WINDSORS: Windsor improved norms of distance and similarity of representations of semantics.
Durda K; Buchanan L
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Aug; 40(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 18697665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grounding co-occurrence: Identifying features in a lexical co-occurrence model of semantic memory.
Durda K; Buchanan L; Caron R
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1210-23. PubMed ID: 19897830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
Hoffman P; Woollams AM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lexical factors and cerebral regions influencing verbal fluency performance in MCI.
Clark DG; Wadley VG; Kapur P; DeRamus TP; Singletary B; Nicholas AP; Blanton PD; Lokken K; Deshpande H; Marson D; Deutsch G
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Feb; 54():98-111. PubMed ID: 24384308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extrapolating human judgments from skip-gram vector representations of word meaning.
Hollis G; Westbury C; Lefsrud L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1603-1619. PubMed ID: 27251936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining the N400 semantic context effect item-by-item: relationship to corpus-based measures of word co-occurrence.
Van Petten C
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):407-19. PubMed ID: 25448377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Co-occurrence frequency evaluated with large language corpora boosts semantic priming effects.
Brunellière A; Perre L; Tran T; Bonnotte I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1922-1934. PubMed ID: 27437558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Checking and bootstrapping lexical norms by means of word similarity indexes.
Bestgen Y; Vincze N
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):998-1006. PubMed ID: 22396137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Newly-acquired words are more phonologically robust in verbal short-term memory when they have associated semantic representations.
Savill N; Ellis AW; Jefferies E
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():85-97. PubMed ID: 26965397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Word frequency effects in high-dimensional co-occurrence models: A new approach.
Shaoul C; Westbury C
Behav Res Methods; 2006 May; 38(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 16956093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning new vocabulary during childhood: effects of semantic training on lexical consolidation and integration.
Henderson L; Weighall A; Gaskell G
J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Nov; 116(3):572-92. PubMed ID: 23981272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics.
Hollis G; Westbury C
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1744-1756. PubMed ID: 27138012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance impact of stop lists and morphological decomposition on word-word corpus-based semantic space models.
Keith J; Westbury C; Goldman J
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):666-84. PubMed ID: 26100766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semantic distance norms computed from an electronic dictionary (WordNet).
Maki WS; McKinley LN; Thompson AG
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Aug; 36(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 15641432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for semantic involvement in regular and exception word reading in emergent readers of English.
Ricketts J; Davies R; Masterson J; Stuart M; Duff FJ
J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():330-345. PubMed ID: 27416563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using context to build semantics.
Kwantes PJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 16447385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the random representation assumption of lexical semantics in cognitive models.
Johns BT; Jones MN
Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):662-72. PubMed ID: 21037164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tracking lexical consolidation with ERPs: Lexical and semantic-priming effects on N400 and LPC responses to newly-learned words.
Bakker I; Takashima A; van Hell JG; Janzen G; McQueen JM
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Dec; 79(Pt A):33-41. PubMed ID: 26476370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: stop-lists, stemming, and SVD.
Bullinaria JA; Levy JP
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):890-907. PubMed ID: 22258891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contextual self-organizing map: software for constructing semantic representations.
Zhao X; Li P; Kohonen T
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 21287105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
