256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18698392)
1. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.
Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS
Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
Greaves M
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing?
Parkinson L; Sims J
Australas J Ageing; 2017 Jun; 36(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 28635096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
Elmore SA
Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Independence Day.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(2):73. PubMed ID: 28282657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to review a paper for Heart.
Otto CM
Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
Sohail S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer Review in Transplantation.
Hutchinson JA
Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Useful reviews.
Parkinson L
Australas J Ageing; 2018 Jun; 37(2):87. PubMed ID: 29870147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. So, You Want to Improve Your Plastic Surgery Papers? Introducing PRS' Friendly EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines.
Rohrich RJ; Weinstein A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jul; 136(1):205-208. PubMed ID: 25829154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Preface: Scientific Premise and Rigors in Scientific Research, Peer Review, Editing and Publishing.
Zhang R
Curr Cancer Drug Targets; 2017; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28067174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.
Lusher AD
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2015 Sep; 115(9):566-9. PubMed ID: 26322935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Taking a peek into the editor's office.
Nat Cell Biol; 2018 Oct; 20(10):1101. PubMed ID: 30258125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Magazine or journal--what is the difference? The role of the monitoring editor.
Bretscher A
Mol Biol Cell; 2013 Apr; 24(7):887-9. PubMed ID: 23533210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review).
Drubin DG
Mol Biol Cell; 2011 Mar; 22(5):525-7. PubMed ID: 21357757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
