406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18700153)
1. An effective method for isolation of DNA from pig faeces and comparison of five different methods.
Tang JN; Zeng ZG; Wang HN; Yang T; Zhang PJ; Li YL; Zhang AY; Fan WQ; Zhang Y; Yang X; Zhao SJ; Tian GB; Zou LK
J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Dec; 75(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 18700153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Development of efficient DNA isolation procedures for Cryptosporidium and Trichinella PCR detection in fecal samples].
Masny A; Rozej W; Gołab E
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2009; 61(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 20120929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PCR and real-time PCR primers developed for detection and identification of Bifidobacterium thermophilum in faeces.
Mathys S; Lacroix C; Mini R; Meile L
BMC Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 8():179. PubMed ID: 18847469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An effective method of DNA extraction for bioleaching bacteria from acid mine drainage.
Zeng L; Huang J; Zhang Y; Qiu G; Tong J; Chen D; Zhou J; Luo X
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Jul; 79(5):881-8. PubMed ID: 18481056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimized PCR-Temporal Temperature Gel Electrophoresis compared to cultivation to assess diversity of gut microbiota in neonates.
Roudière L; Jacquot A; Marchandin H; Aujoulat F; Devine R; Zorgniotti I; Jean-Pierre H; Picaud JC; Jumas-Bilak E
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Nov; 79(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 19686785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple displacement amplification as a pre-polymerase chain reaction (pre-PCR) to process difficult to amplify samples and low copy number sequences from natural environments.
Gonzalez JM; Portillo MC; Saiz-Jimenez C
Environ Microbiol; 2005 Jul; 7(7):1024-8. PubMed ID: 15946299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid identification and differentiation of agricultural faecal contamination sources using multiplex PCR.
Baker-Austin C; Morris J; Lowther JA; Rangdale R; Lees DN
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Oct; 49(4):529-32. PubMed ID: 19708886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a multiplex-PCR for rapid detection of the enteric pathogens Lawsonia intracellularis, Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, and Brachyspira pilosicoli in porcine faeces.
La T; Collins AM; Phillips ND; Oksa A; Hampson DJ
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 42(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 16478518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of several methods for the extraction of high quality DNA from acetic acid bacteria in wine and vinegar for characterization by PCR-based methods.
Jara C; Mateo E; Guillamón JM; Torija MJ; Mas A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 128(2):336-41. PubMed ID: 18950887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bacterial community analysis of activated sludge: an evaluation of four commonly used DNA extraction methods.
Vanysacker L; Declerck SA; Hellemans B; De Meester L; Vankelecom I; Declerck P
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Sep; 88(1):299-307. PubMed ID: 20652692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Method for rapid DNA extraction from bacterial communities of different soils].
Zaporozhenko EV; Slobodova NV; Bulygina ES; Kravchenko IK; Kuznetsov BB
Mikrobiologiia; 2006; 75(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 16579454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative improvement of 16S rDNA DGGE analysis for soil bacterial community using real-time PCR.
Ahn JH; Kim YJ; Kim T; Song HG; Kang C; Ka JO
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Aug; 78(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 19523498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Establishment of a semi-automated pathogen DNA isolation from whole blood and comparison with commercially available kits.
Wiesinger-Mayr H; Jordana-Lluch E; Martró E; Schoenthaler S; Noehammer C
J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Jun; 85(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 21397640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Development of bacterial community in faeces of weaning piglets as revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis].
Zhu W; Yao W; Mao S
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 43(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 16276927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of DNA isolation methods and detection of Salmonella spp. from animal faeces and dust using invA real-time PCR.
Braun SD; Methner U
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2011; 124(5-6):177-85. PubMed ID: 22059286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of five commercial nucleic acid extraction kits for their ability to inactivate Bacillus anthracis spores and comparison of DNA yields from spores and spiked environmental samples.
Dauphin LA; Moser BD; Bowen MD
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Jan; 76(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18824041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods from mouse stomachs for the quantification of H. pylori by real-time PCR.
Roussel Y; Wilks M; Harris A; Mein C; Tabaqchali S
J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Jul; 62(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 15823395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distribution of specific tetracycline and erythromycin resistance genes in environmental samples assessed by macroarray detection.
Patterson AJ; Colangeli R; Spigaglia P; Scott KP
Environ Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 9(3):703-15. PubMed ID: 17298370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of a modified broad-range 16S rDNA PCR for diagnostic purposes in clinical microbiology.
Cherkaoui A; Emonet S; Ceroni D; Candolfi B; Hibbs J; Francois P; Schrenzel J
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Nov; 79(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 19782706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PCR-based community structure studies of bacteria associated with eukaryotic organisms: a simple PCR strategy to avoid co-amplification of eukaryotic DNA.
Bakke I; De Schryver P; Boon N; Vadstein O
J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Feb; 84(2):349-51. PubMed ID: 21182876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
