133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18700369)
1. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning.
Peker I; Alkurt MT; Michcioglu T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 18700369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
Mehra A; Pai KM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
Gher ME; Richardson AC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
Todd AD; Gher ME; Quintero G; Richardson AC
J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative assessment of the mandibular canal in implant surgery: comparison of rotational panoramic radiography (OPG), computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for preoperative assessment in implant surgery.
Pertl L; Gashi-Cenkoglu B; Reichmann J; Jakse N; Pertl C
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 23513204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of objective plane angulation on the mandibular image using cross-sectional tomography.
Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Kubota Y; Okumura S; Hayashi H; Ariji E
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 16836175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Localization of mental and mandibular foramens on the conventional and digital panoramic images.
Peker I; Gungor K; Semiz M; Tekdemir I
Coll Antropol; 2009 Sep; 33(3):857-62. PubMed ID: 19860115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
Garg AK; Vicari A
Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Russell CM; Sharawy M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. Part 1: Technique.
Stella JP; Tharanon W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2391135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants.
Yang J; Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Mar; 87(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10102603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in the pre-surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography.
Diniz AF; Mendonça EF; Leles CR; Guilherme AS; Cavalcante MP; Silva MA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 18237315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between cancellous bone density and mandibular canal depiction.
Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Kubota Y; Hayashi M; Ariji E
Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 19359861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.
Frei C; Buser D; Dula K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 15248885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three radiographic methods used to locate the mandibular canal in the buccolingual direction before bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Ylikontiola L; Moberg K; Huumonen S; Soikkonen K; Oikarinen K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jun; 93(6):736-42. PubMed ID: 12142882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
