136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18700521)
1. The 2007 Census Test: evaluation of key objectives.
Compton G
Popul Trends; 2008; (132):26-33. PubMed ID: 18700521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 2007 Census Test: a major step towards the 2011 Census.
Benton P; McLaren E; Walker S; White I
Popul Trends; 2006; (126):16-28. PubMed ID: 17228616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The 2011 Census: a proposed design for England and Wales.
Benton P; Massingham R; Brown H; White I
Popul Trends; 2004; (115):16-23. PubMed ID: 15192890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 2011 Census Field design: getting the numbers right.
Townsend N
Popul Trends; 2011; (143):19-28. PubMed ID: 21464829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of 2001 Census for local authority district mid-year population estimates.
Smith J; Chappell R; Whitworth A; Duncan C
Popul Trends; 2003; (113):20-31. PubMed ID: 14582210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population bases and the 2011 Census.
Smallwood S
Popul Trends; 2011; (143):29-46. PubMed ID: 21464830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Key issues in the quality assurance of the One Number Census.
Diamond I; Abbott O; Jackson N
Popul Trends; 2003; (113):11-9. PubMed ID: 14582209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rebasing the annual mid-year population estimates for England and Wales.
Duncan C; Chappell R; Smith J; Clark L; Ambrose F
Popul Trends; 2002; (109):9-14. PubMed ID: 12643045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Looking beyond the 2001 Census.
Benton P; White I
Popul Trends; 2003; (113):7-10. PubMed ID: 14582208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trouble with farms at the Census Office: an evaluation of farm statistics from the censuses of 1851-1881 in England and Wales.
Mills DR
Agric Hist Rev; 1999; 47(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 19291883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Decree No. 63 of 26 September 1989 regulating the performance of the Ninth National Population Census and the Fifth National Housing Census, in accordance with Decree Law No. 7 of 25 February 1960.
Panama
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():219. PubMed ID: 12344340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geography for the 2001 Census in England and Wales.
Martin D
Popul Trends; 2002; (108):7-15. PubMed ID: 12138615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2011 census overview.
Watson G
Popul Trends; 2011; (143):6-9. PubMed ID: 21464827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assuring the 2011 Census population estimates.
Wroth-Smith J; Abbott O; Compton G; Benton P
Popul Trends; 2011; (143):10-8. PubMed ID: 21464828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population estimates; backseries methodology for 1992-2000.
Littlefield M; Fulton R
Popul Trends; 2005; (122):18-26. PubMed ID: 16411621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the 2009 rehearsal and lessons learned for the 2011 Census.
Townsend N
Popul Trends; 2010; (140):125-52. PubMed ID: 20616804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The development of a 'Postcode Best Fit' methodology for producing population estimates for different geographies.
Bates A
Popul Trends; 2008; (133):28-34. PubMed ID: 18847066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2001 Census output areas: from concept to prototype.
Martin D
Popul Trends; 1998; (94):19-24. PubMed ID: 9885833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small area population estimates project: data quality of administrative datasets.
Bates A
Popul Trends; 2004; (116):11-7. PubMed ID: 15272623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A demographic statistics service for the 21st century.
Fullerton PJ
Popul Trends; 2003; (113):32-9. PubMed ID: 14582211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
