These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1870054)

  • 1. Critical analysis of the validity of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Jongsma HW; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 1991; 19(1-2):33-7. PubMed ID: 1870054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Valiño N; Giunta G; Gallo DM; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 47(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 26094952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between Apgar score, umbilical artery pH and operative delivery for fetal distress in 2778 infants born at term.
    Hoffmann AL; Hjortdal JO; Secher NJ; Weile B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1991 Jan; 38(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 1995389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal distress and the condition of the newborn using cardiotocography and fetal blood analysis during labour.
    van den Berg P; Schmidt S; Gesche J; Saling E
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Jan; 94(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 3814558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Valiño N; Giunta G; Gallo DM; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 47(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 26224608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants.
    Sykes GS; Molloy PM; Johnson P; Stirrat GM; Turnbull AC
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Oct; 287(6397):943-5. PubMed ID: 6412897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal electrocardiogram ST-segment analysis and prediction of neonatal acidosis.
    Vayssiere C; Haberstich R; Sebahoun V; David E; Roth E; Langer B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 May; 97(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 17368461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical usefulness of pulse oximetry in the fetus with non-reassuring heart rate pattern?
    Schmidt S; Koslowski S; Sierra F; Meyer-Wittkopf M; Heller G
    J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(4):298-305. PubMed ID: 11031700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical analysis of the validity of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Jongsma HW; Nijhuis JG
    Neonatal Intensive Care; 1992; 5(6):52-4. PubMed ID: 10148256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal recoil during labor to evaluate fetal well-being when heart rate monitoring is not informative.
    Elliott JP; Clewell WH; Hutson E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 89(5 Pt 2):800-2. PubMed ID: 9166325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of fetal blood sampling on vaginal delivery and neonatal outcome in deliveries complicated by pathologic fetal heart rate: a population based cohort study.
    Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Misselwitz B; Schmidt S
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 17140298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry compared with fetal heart rate monitoring as a labor admission test.
    Chan FY; Lam C; Lam YH; To WK; Pun TC; Lee CP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1994 Mar; 54(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8045327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrapartum computerized fetal heart rate parameters and metabolic acidosis at birth.
    Agrawal SK; Doucette F; Gratton R; Richardson B; Gagnon R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 102(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 14551003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human fetal breathing monitoring--clinical considerations.
    Manning FA; Platt LD
    Semin Perinatol; 1980 Oct; 4(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 7001639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Acute fetal distress].
    Boog G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Sep; 30(5):393-432. PubMed ID: 11598554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ST segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram plus electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labor and its relationship to umbilical cord arterial blood gases.
    Dervaitis KL; Poole M; Schmidt G; Penava D; Natale R; Gagnon R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):879-84. PubMed ID: 15467558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study.
    Herbst A; Ingemarsson I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
    Kwee A; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Veerman J; Dekkers AH; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.