502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18702687)
41. Evaluation of a novel colonoscope designed for easier passage through flexures: a randomized study.
Hoff G; Bretthauer M; Huppertz-Hauss G; Sauar J; Paulsen J; Dahler S; Kjellevold Ø
Endoscopy; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1123-6. PubMed ID: 16281143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 11818918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
Garborg KK; Løberg M; Matre J; Holme O; Kalager M; Hoff G; Bretthauer M
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):740-6. PubMed ID: 22622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Factors that influence cecal intubation rate during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients.
Hsu CM; Lin WP; Su MY; Chiu CT; Ho YP; Chen PC
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jan; 27(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 21649720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [An adult gastroscope instead of an adult colonoscope for colon examination in children].
Gan T; Zhang MG
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 10(3):346-8. PubMed ID: 18554465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy.
Okamoto M; Kawabe T; Kato J; Yamaji Y; Ikenoue T; Omata M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 39(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 16082276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.
Nemoto D; Utano K; Endo S; Isohata N; Hewett DG; Togashi K
Dig Endosc; 2017 Mar; 29(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 27859645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparative study of a responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscope versus a variable-stiffness colonoscope.
Prieto-de-Frías C; Muñoz-Navas M; Carretero C; Carrascosa J; Betés MT; de-la-Riva S; Herraiz MT; Súbtil JC
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2013 Apr; 105(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 23859449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy.
Zuber-Jerger I; Endlicher E; Gelbmann CM
Med Klin (Munich); 2008 Jul; 103(7):477-81. PubMed ID: 18604482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap.
Matsushita M; Hajiro K; Okazaki K; Takakuwa H; Tominaga M
Endoscopy; 1998 Jun; 30(5):444-7. PubMed ID: 9693890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cap-assisted water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: prospective, randomized, single-center trial.
Falt P; Šmajstrla V; Fojtík P; Liberda M; Kliment M; Tvrdík J; Urban O
Dig Endosc; 2013 Jul; 25(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 23808948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial ("PACE study").
Eickhoff A; van Dam J; Jakobs R; Kudis V; Hartmann D; Damian U; Weickert U; Schilling D; Riemann JF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 17156149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Enteroscope without overtube for cecal intubation after an incomplete colonoscopy.
Coppola F; Gaia S; Cosimato M; Recchia S
Dig Liver Dis; 2011 Jun; 43(6):475-7. PubMed ID: 21334994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.
Sato K; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Hihara D; Tominaga K; Yasuda I; Maetani I
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5150-5158. PubMed ID: 28488178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Colonoscope with a sub-distal hyper-flaccid segment for improved insertion at colonoscopy: a randomized study.
Hoff G; Moritz V; Bretthauer M; Ludolph T; Huppertz-Hauss G; Paulsen J; Seip B; Sauar J; Kjellevold Ø; Chengarov L
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 20923378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients.
Lichtenstein GR; Park PD; Long WB; Ginsberg GG; Kochman ML
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jan; 94(1):187-90. PubMed ID: 9934753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Artificial bowel markers: a novel method for measuring the accuracy of colonoscopy.
Beckly JB; Douie WJ; Hayward CM; Oppong CF; Coleman MG; Beckly DE; Hosie KB
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jul; 50(7):1047-52. PubMed ID: 17279301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Double-balloon endoscopy versus magnet-imaging enhanced colonoscopy for difficult colonoscopies, a randomized study.
Suzuki T; Matsushima M; Tsukune Y; Fujisawa M; Yazaki T; Uchida T; Gocyo S; Okita I; Shirakura K; Sasao K; Saito T; Sakamoto I; Igarashi M; Koike J; Takagi A; Mine T
Endoscopy; 2012 Jan; 44(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22143991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Improvement in colonoscopy performance with adjunctive magnetic endoscope imaging: a randomized controlled trial.
Cheung HY; Chung CC; Kwok SY; Tsang WW; Li MK
Endoscopy; 2006 Mar; 38(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 16528645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
