These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18703332)

  • 1. Source specific fecal bacteria modeling using soil and water assessment tool model.
    Parajuli PB; Mankin KR; Barnes PL
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(2):953-63. PubMed ID: 18703332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria.
    Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): sources, fate and modelling.
    Servais P; Garcia-Armisen T; George I; Billen G
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 375(1-3):152-67. PubMed ID: 17239424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Models of total and presumed wildlife sources of fecal coliform bacteria in coastal ponds.
    Siewicki TC; Pullaro T; Pan W; McDaniel S; Glenn R; Stewart J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 16556478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The modified SWAT model for predicting fecal coliforms in the Wachusett Reservoir Watershed, USA.
    Cho KH; Pachepsky YA; Kim JH; Kim JW; Park MH
    Water Res; 2012 Oct; 46(15):4750-60. PubMed ID: 22784807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence.
    Stoeckel DM; Stelzer EA; Stogner RW; Mau DP
    Water Res; 2011 May; 45(10):3225-44. PubMed ID: 21513966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of Bacteroides measurements for reducing the statistical uncertainty associated with hydrologic flow and fecal loads in a mixed use watershed.
    Gentry RW; Layton AC; McKay LD; McCarthy JF; Williams DE; Koirala SR; Sayler GS
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(5):1324-30. PubMed ID: 17636294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions.
    Geza M; McCray JE
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Aug; 88(3):393-406. PubMed ID: 17475392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining the source of fecal contamination in recreational waters.
    Meyer KJ; Appletoft CM; Schwemm AK; Uzoigwe JC; Brown EJ
    J Environ Health; 2005; 68(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16121484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
    Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using SWAT, Bacteroidales microbial source tracking markers, and fecal indicator bacteria to predict waterborne pathogen occurrence in an agricultural watershed.
    Frey SK; Topp E; Edge T; Fall C; Gannon V; Jokinen C; Marti R; Neumann N; Ruecker N; Wilkes G; Lapen DR
    Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(16):6326-37. PubMed ID: 24079968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of fecal coliform sources at a coastal site using colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) as a water source tracer.
    Clark CD; O'Connor AP; Foley DM; de Bruyn WJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1507-13. PubMed ID: 17574279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wildlife identified as major source of Escherichia coli in agriculturally dominated watersheds by BOX A1R-derived genetic fingerprints.
    Somarelli JA; Makarewicz JC; Sia R; Simon R
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16551490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing fecal coliform fate and transport in a coastal watershed using HSPF.
    Rolle K; Gitau MW; Chen G; Chauhan A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 22797240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying human and livestock sources of fecal contamination in Kenya with host-specific Bacteroidales assays.
    Jenkins MW; Tiwari S; Lorente M; Gichaba CM; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4956-66. PubMed ID: 19692107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling sediment and nitrogen export from a rural watershed in eastern Canada using the soil and water assessment tool.
    Nafees Ahmad HM; Sinclair A; Jamieson R; Madani A; Hebb D; Havard P; Yiridoe EK
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1182-94. PubMed ID: 21712588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distribution of indicator bacteria in Canyon Lake, California.
    Davis K; Anderson MA; Yates MV
    Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(7):1277-88. PubMed ID: 15862327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growing season surface water loading of fecal indicator organisms within a rural watershed.
    Sinclair A; Hebb D; Jamieson R; Gordon R; Benedict K; Fuller K; Stratton GW; Madani A
    Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(5):1199-206. PubMed ID: 19117588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling sediment impact on the transport of fecal bacteria.
    Bai S; Lung WS
    Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5232-40. PubMed ID: 16307774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating true human and animal host source contribution in quantitative microbial source tracking using the Monte Carlo method.
    Wang D; Silkie SS; Nelson KL; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4760-75. PubMed ID: 20822794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.