These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18703928)

  • 1. Curses--winner's and otherwise--in genetic epidemiology.
    Kraft P
    Epidemiology; 2008 Sep; 19(5):649-51; discussion 657-8. PubMed ID: 18703928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in genetic association studies.
    Xiao R; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 33(5):453-62. PubMed ID: 19140131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accurate modeling of replication rates in genome-wide association studies by accounting for Winner's Curse and study-specific heterogeneity.
    Zou J; Zhou J; Faller S; Brown RP; Sankararaman SS; Eskin E
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36250793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical correction of the Winner's Curse explains replication variability in quantitative trait genome-wide association studies.
    Palmer C; Pe'er I
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1006916. PubMed ID: 28715421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overcoming the winner's curse: estimating penetrance parameters from case-control data.
    Zollner S; Pritchard JK
    Am J Hum Genet; 2007 Apr; 80(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 17357068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in quantitative-trait association studies.
    Xiao R; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 35(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 21284035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power estimation and sample size determination for replication studies of genome-wide association studies.
    Jiang W; Yu W
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3. PubMed ID: 26818952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies: methodologies, between-study heterogeneity and winner's curse.
    Nakaoka H; Inoue I
    J Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 54(11):615-23. PubMed ID: 19851339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication selection in health policy research: the winner's curse hypothesis.
    Costa-Font J; McGuire A; Stanley T
    Health Policy; 2013 Jan; 109(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 23182564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review and further developments in statistical corrections for Winner's Curse in genetic association studies.
    Forde A; Hemani G; Ferguson J
    PLoS Genet; 2023 Sep; 19(9):e1010546. PubMed ID: 37721937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BR-squared: a practical solution to the winner's curse in genome-wide scans.
    Sun L; Dimitromanolakis A; Faye LL; Paterson AD; Waggott D; ; Bull SB
    Hum Genet; 2011 May; 129(5):545-52. PubMed ID: 21246217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Illustrating, Quantifying, and Correcting for Bias in Post-hoc Analysis of Gene-Based Rare Variant Tests of Association.
    Grinde KE; Arbet J; Green A; O'Connell M; Valcarcel A; Westra J; Tintle N
    Front Genet; 2017; 8():117. PubMed ID: 28959274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple yet accurate correction for winner's curse can predict signals discovered in much larger genome scans.
    Bigdeli TB; Lee D; Webb BT; Riley BP; Vladimirov VI; Fanous AH; Kendler KS; Bacanu SA
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):2598-603. PubMed ID: 27187203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The projack: a resampling approach to correct for ranking bias in high-throughput studies.
    Zhou YH; Wright FA
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 26040912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers.
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    J Hum Genet; 2001; 46(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 11501946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing untyped alleles (TUNA)-applications to genome-wide association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):718-27. PubMed ID: 16986160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical Bayes correction for the Winner's Curse in genetic association studies.
    Ferguson JP; Cho JH; Yang C; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 37(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 23012258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of small effect sizes of individual genetic variants on the design and interpretation of genetic association studies of complex diseases.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA; Khoury MJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 164(7):609-14. PubMed ID: 16893921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multipoint linkage disequilibrium mapping using multilocus allele frequency data.
    Johnson T
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Jul; 69(Pt 4):474-97. PubMed ID: 15996175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.