These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18703928)

  • 21. Assessing risk factors with information beyond P value thresholds: Statistical significance does not equal clinical importance.
    Putt ME
    Cancer; 2021 Apr; 127(8):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 33351186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficiency of DNA pooling to estimate joint allele frequencies and measure linkage disequilibrium.
    Pfeiffer RM; Rutter JL; Gail MH; Struewing J; Gastwirth JL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Jan; 22(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 11754476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimal haplotype structure for linkage disequilibrium-based fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using identity by descent.
    Grapes L; Firat MZ; Dekkers JC; Rothschild MF; Fernando RL
    Genetics; 2006 Mar; 172(3):1955-65. PubMed ID: 16322505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of whole genome linkage-linkage disequilibrium and association results, and identification of markers to predict genetic merit for twinning.
    Bierman CD; Kim E; Shi XW; Weigel K; Jeffrey Berger P; Kirkpatrick BW
    Anim Genet; 2010 Aug; 41(4):406-16. PubMed ID: 20331594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse.
    Forstmeier W; Schielzeth H
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2011 Jan; 65(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 21297852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Type I error rates in association versus joint linkage/association tests in related individuals.
    Kent JW; Dyer TD; Göring HH; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 17219375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detecting susceptibility genes in case-control studies using set association.
    Kim S; Zhang K; Sun F
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. PubMed ID: 14975077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Aspects of observing and claiming allele flips in association studies.
    Clarke GM; Cardon LR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 20013941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The false-positive to false-negative ratio in epidemiologic studies.
    Ioannidis JP; Tarone R; McLaughlin JK
    Epidemiology; 2011 Jul; 22(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 21490505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping.
    Devlin B; Risch N
    Genomics; 1995 Sep; 29(2):311-22. PubMed ID: 8666377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reporting genetic association studies: the STREGA statement.
    von Elm E; Moher D; Little J;
    Lancet; 2009 Jul; 374(9684):98-100. PubMed ID: 19595330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies.
    Skol AD; Scott LJ; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M
    Nat Genet; 2006 Feb; 38(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 16415888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between case-control studies and the transmission/disequilibrium test.
    Mitchell LE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Oct; 19(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 11015123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Circumventing multiple testing: a multilocus Monte Carlo approach to testing for association.
    McIntyre LM; Martin ER; Simonsen KL; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 10861894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On selecting markers for association studies: patterns of linkage disequilibrium between two and three diallelic loci.
    Garner C; Slatkin M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 12508256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTL.
    Zhao H; Nettleton D; Soller M; Dekkers JC
    Genet Res; 2005 Aug; 86(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 16181525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical multilocus methods for disequilibrium analysis in complex traits.
    Ott J; Hoh J
    Hum Mutat; 2001 Apr; 17(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 11295826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genome scanning for complex disease genes using the transmission/disequilibrium test and haplotype-based haplotype relative risk.
    Matise TC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 8787987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The power of numbers.
    Dauriz M; Meigs JB
    Diabetologia; 2016 Jul; 59(7):1400-1402. PubMed ID: 27115413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.