317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18704407)
1. The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials.
Boellaard R; Oyen WJ; Hoekstra CJ; Hoekstra OS; Visser EP; Willemsen AT; Arends B; Verzijlbergen FJ; Zijlstra J; Paans AM; Comans EF; Pruim J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Dec; 35(12):2320-33. PubMed ID: 18704407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters.
Westerterp M; Pruim J; Oyen W; Hoekstra O; Paans A; Visser E; van Lanschot J; Sloof G; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):392-404. PubMed ID: 17033848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardization of image quality across multiple centers by optimization of acquisition and reconstruction parameters with interim FDG-PET/CT for evaluating diffuse large B cell lymphoma.
Daisaki H; Tateishi U; Terauchi T; Tatsumi M; Suzuki K; Shimada N; Nishida H; Numata A; Kato K; Akashi K; Harada M
Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Apr; 27(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 23264065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interim positron emission tomography scan in multi-center studies: optimization of visual and quantitative assessments.
Zijlstra JM; Boellaard R; Hoekstra OS
Leuk Lymphoma; 2009 Nov; 50(11):1748-9. PubMed ID: 19863171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methodological aspects of multicenter studies with quantitative PET.
Boellaard R
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 727():335-49. PubMed ID: 21331942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation of system performance, quality control standards and adherence to international FDG-PET/CT imaging guidelines. A national survey of PET/CT operations in Austria.
Rausch I; Bergmann H; Geist B; Schaffarich M; Hirtl A; Hacker M; Beyer T
Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(6):242-8. PubMed ID: 25131649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total-body
Hu P; Zhang Y; Yu H; Chen S; Tan H; Qi C; Dong Y; Wang Y; Deng Z; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2384-2394. PubMed ID: 33866409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET.
Stahl A; Ott K; Schwaiger M; Weber WA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1471-8. PubMed ID: 15257418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application.
Karakatsanis NA; Lodge MA; Tahari AK; Zhou Y; Wahl RL; Rahmim A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7391-418. PubMed ID: 24080962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneous [
Zhuang M; Karakatsanis NA; Dierckx RAJO; Zaidi H
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Apr; 21(2):317-327. PubMed ID: 29956119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality control for quantitative multicenter whole-body PET/MR studies: A NEMA image quality phantom study with three current PET/MR systems.
Boellaard R; Rausch I; Beyer T; Delso G; Yaqub M; Quick HH; Sattler B
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5961-9. PubMed ID: 26429271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability and uncertainty of 18F-FDG PET imaging protocols for assessing inflammation in atherosclerosis: suggestions for improvement.
Huet P; Burg S; Le Guludec D; Hyafil F; Buvat I
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):552-9. PubMed ID: 25722452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative Analysis of Torso FDG-PET Scans by Using Anatomical Standardization of Normal Cases from Thorough Physical Examinations.
Hara T; Kobayashi T; Ito S; Zhou X; Katafuchi T; Fujita H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125713. PubMed ID: 26020960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
