243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18704610)
21. [Complications with the acetabular cup in the CLS total hip joint endoprosthesis].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Deduch J; Hudecek F
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 11706722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term clinical outcome of acetabular cup revision surgery: comparison of cemented cups, cementless cups, and cemented cups with reinforcement devices.
Kokubo Y; Oki H; Sugita D; Negoro K; Takeno K; Miyazaki T; Nakajima H
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 May; 26(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 27010392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.
Amenabar T; Rahman WA; Hetaimish BM; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Gross AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 25712864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture at 3-18 years.
Schreurs BW; Zengerink M; Welten ML; van Kampen A; Slooff TJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Aug; (437):145-51. PubMed ID: 16056042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components: a 2- to 13-year follow-up study of 142 aseptic revisions.
Comba F; Buttaro M; Pusso R; Piccaluga F
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jul; 88(7):865-9. PubMed ID: 16798986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.
Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cemented hip designs are a reasonable option in young patients.
Busch V; Klarenbeek R; Slooff T; Schreurs BW; Gardeniers J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3214-20. PubMed ID: 20405346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Acetabular revision with bone grafting and cementation for aseptic loosening after primary Charnley low-friction hip arthroplasty with structural bulk autografts.
Mohammed R; Drampalos E; Siney P; Purbach B; Kay P
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2016 Dec; 24(3):328-331. PubMed ID: 28031500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Favorable survival of acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting in dysplastic hips.
Somford MP; Bolder SB; Gardeniers JW; Slooff TJ; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Feb; 466(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 18196418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Treatment of Acetabular Defects with Porous Metal Augments in Revision Hip Surgery.
Ciriviri J; Nestorovski Z; Talevski D; Vranishkovski T; Kostov H
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2019 Oct; 40(2):33-39. PubMed ID: 31605583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Acetabular revision surgery with impacted bone allografts and cemented cups in patients younger than 55 years.
Comba F; Buttaro M; Pusso R; Piccaluga F
Int Orthop; 2009 Jun; 33(3):611-6. PubMed ID: 18264707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Reconstruction of acetabular defect with wire mesh and impacted bone graft in cemented acetabular revision].
Lian YY; Pei FX; Cheng JQ; Feng W; Zhang H
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 87(23):1603-6. PubMed ID: 17803848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Acetabular Reconstructions with Impaction Bone-Grafting and a Cemented Cup in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age: A Concise Follow-up, at 27 to 35 Years, of a Previous Report.
Schmitz MWJL; Hannink G; Gardeniers JWM; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJJH; Schreurs BW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Oct; 99(19):1640-1646. PubMed ID: 28976428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A cemented cup with acetabular impaction bone grafting is more cost-effective than an uncemented cup in patients under 50 years.
Busch VJ; Verschueren J; Adang EM; Lie SA; Havelin LI; Schreurs BW
Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 26743037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum.
Makita H; Kerboull M; Inaba Y; Tezuka T; Saito T; Kerboull L
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3502-3509. PubMed ID: 28711340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty.
Kostensalo I; Seppänen M; Virolainen P; Mokka J; Koivisto M; Mäkelä KT
Scand J Surg; 2015 Dec; 104(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 25681057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss.
Borland WS; Bhattacharya R; Holland JP; Brewster NT
Acta Orthop; 2012 Aug; 83(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 22900910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
