These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1870483)

  • 21. Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K; Lenzen H; Kamm KF; Link TM; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 11818613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monte Carlo studies of x-ray scattering in transmission diagnostic radiology.
    Barnea G; Dick CE
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 3736507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
    Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Oral cholecystography: comparison of conventional screen-film with photostimulable imaging plate radiographs.
    Srivastava DN; Kulshrestha A; Gujral RB; Phadke RV
    Gastrointest Radiol; 1991; 16(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 1991610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improved Bayesian image estimation for digital chest radiography.
    Baydush AH; Bowsher JE; Laading JK; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 9127306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scatter radiation in cephalometric radiography: the effects of grid and collimation.
    Tsuji Y; Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 16798926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical experience in the use of photostimulable phosphor radiographic systems.
    Murphey MD; Huang HK; Siegel EL; Hillman BJ; Bramble JM
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 1860768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. WAXS fat subtraction model to estimate differential linear scattering coefficients of fatless breast tissue: phantom materials evaluation.
    Tang RY; Laamanen C; McDonald N; LeClair RJ
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):053501. PubMed ID: 24784407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative dental radiography with a new photostimulable phosphor system.
    Couture RA; Hildebolt C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Apr; 89(4):498-508. PubMed ID: 10760734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 8421741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures in a porcine model: radiation dose requirement--digital flat-panel versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems.
    Ludwig K; Schülke C; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Lenzen H; Bernhardt TM; Brinckmann P; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 12615999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative radiographic imaging using a photostimulable phosphor system.
    Floyd CE; Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 2385203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Hochbergs P; Lindberg CG; Medin J; Nordström AJ; Sanfridsson J; Vojciechowski J
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Sommer A; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bayesian image estimation of digital chest radiography: interdependence of noise, resolution, and scatter fraction.
    Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1255-61. PubMed ID: 7476711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scatter fractions in AMBER imaging.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):879-80. PubMed ID: 2244003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Resolution degradation due to K-characteristic photon absorption in dual phosphor image receptors.
    McLean D
    Med Phys; 1999 Apr; 26(4):643-7. PubMed ID: 10227367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.