1079 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18705740)
1. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.
Rosenthal MA; Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Arkell K; Dodds M;
Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):650-4. PubMed ID: 16248858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity.
Mielke J; Ndebele P
Cent Afr J Med; 2004; 50(11-12):115-9. PubMed ID: 16615661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing primary care review criteria from evidence-based guidelines: coronary heart disease as a model.
Hutchinson A; McIntosh A; Anderson J; Gilbert C; Field R
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Sep; 53(494):690-6. PubMed ID: 15103876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.
Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Mok MT; Dodds M; Rosenthal MA
Intern Med J; 2004 Nov; 34(11):598-603. PubMed ID: 15546452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the use of evidence-based heart failure therapies in the outpatient setting: the IMPROVE HF performance improvement registry.
Fonarow GC; Yancy CW; Albert NM; Curtis AB; Stough WG; Gheorghiade M; Heywood JT; Mehra M; O'Connor CM; Reynolds D; Walsh MN
Am Heart J; 2007 Jul; 154(1):12-38. PubMed ID: 17584548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A guide to multi-centre ethics for surgical research in Australia and New Zealand.
Boult M; Fitzpatrick K; Maddern G; Fitridge R
ANZ J Surg; 2011 Mar; 81(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 21342383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Governance approval for multisite, non-interventional research: what can Harmonisation of Multi-Centre Ethical Review learn from the New South Wales experience?
Vajdic CM; Meagher NS; Hicks SC; Faedo M; Ward RL; Pearson SA
Intern Med J; 2012 Feb; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 21241439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human research ethics in practice: deliberative strategies, processes and perceptions.
Gillam L; Guillemin M; Bolitho A; Rosenthal D
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2009 Mar; 28(1):7.1-17. PubMed ID: 19839277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Unnecessary delays in ethical approval of multicentre clinical trials].
Evers JL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2062-4. PubMed ID: 18837181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The difficulties and costs of ethical assessment of a national research project.
Dockerty JD; Elwood M
N Z Med J; 1992 Aug; 105(939):311-3. PubMed ID: 1501815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand.
Paul C
N Z Med J; 2000 Jun; 113(1111):210-4. PubMed ID: 10909934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harmonisation of ethics committees' practice in 10 European countries.
Hernandez R; Cooney M; Dualé C; Gálvez M; Gaynor S; Kardos G; Kubiak C; Mihaylov S; Pleiner J; Ruberto G; Sanz N; Skoog M; Souri P; Stiller CO; Strenge-Hesse A; Vas A; Winter D; Carné X
J Med Ethics; 2009 Nov; 35(11):696-700. PubMed ID: 19880708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Gooszen HG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2077-83. PubMed ID: 18837184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional perspectives in research ethics: a report from Bangladesh.
Harun-Ar-Rashid
East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S66-72. PubMed ID: 17037691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Quality indicators for National Disease Management Guidelines using the example of the National Disease Management Guideline for "Chronic Heart Failure"].
Nothacker MJ; Langer T; Weinbrenner S
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 21382602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance of ethical issues and regulatory aspects relating to good clinical practices in the HELENA Cross-Sectional Study.
Béghin L; Castera M; Manios Y; Gilbert CC; Kersting M; De Henauw S; Kafatos A; Gottrand F; Molnar D; Sjöström M; Leclercq C; Widhalm K; Mesana MI; Moreno LA; Libersa C;
Int J Obes (Lond); 2008 Nov; 32 Suppl 5():S12-8. PubMed ID: 19011647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.
Manchikanti L; Singh V; Helm S; Schultz DM; Datta S; Hirsch JA;
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E1-33. PubMed ID: 19668280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
