These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18705786)

  • 1. Commentary on Darbyshire P (2004) 'rage against the machine?: nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13, 17-25.
    Mann C
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(15):2090-1. PubMed ID: 18705786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Darbyshire P (2004) 'Rage against the machine?': Nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13, 17-25.
    Dezarn TL
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Feb; 15(2):237. PubMed ID: 16422744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To DeZarn's commentary on Darbyshire P (2004) 'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information.
    Darbyshire P
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Aug; 15(8):1060-1. PubMed ID: 16879551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using Computerized Patient Information Systems for clinical information.
    Darbyshire P
    J Clin Nurs; 2004 Jan; 13(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 14687289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Moderating and mediating roles of nurses' beliefs: information systems use among Ohio nurses.
    Abdrbo AA; Hudak CA; Anthony MK; Douglas SL
    West J Nurs Res; 2009 Feb; 31(1):110-27. PubMed ID: 19028922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What nurses want: diffusion of an innovation.
    Di Pietro T; Coburn G; Dharamshi N; Doran D; Mylopoulos J; Kushniruk A; Nagle L; Sidani S; Tourangeau A; Laurie-Shaw B; Lefebre N; Reid-Haughian C; Carryer J; McArthur G
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2008; 23(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 18344780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence in the palm of your hand: development of an outcomes-focused knowledge translation intervention.
    Doran DM; Mylopoulos J; Kushniruk A; Nagle L; Laurie-Shaw B; Sidani S; Tourangeau AE; Lefebre N; Reid-Haughian C; Carryer JR; Cranley LA; McArthur G
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2007; 4(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 17553107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. I.T. often a tough sell to nursing staffs.
    Gillespe G
    Health Data Manag; 2002 Apr; 10(4):56-9. PubMed ID: 11963415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supporting nurse decision making in primary care: exploring use of and attitude to decision tools.
    Randell R; Mitchell N; Thompson C; McCaughan D; Dowding D
    Health Informatics J; 2009 Mar; 15(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 19218308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [In some community health information centers. Interview by Jeanne Morazain].
    Pouliot L; Lacombe D
    Perspect Infirm; 2008; 5(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 18724520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nursing satisfaction and attitudes with computerized software implementation: a quasi-experimental study.
    Smith D; Morris A; Janke J
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Apr; 29(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 21048497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leaving the paper trail behind.
    Dragon N
    Aust Nurs J; 2008 Jul; 16(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 18727263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical information systems. If you build it, will they come?
    Burge L; Creps L; Wright B
    Health Manag Technol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):14-5, 18, 20. PubMed ID: 11552511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midwives' journal. A reassuring familiar face?
    Lee G
    Nurs Times; 1994 Apr 27-May 3; 90(17):66-7. PubMed ID: 8177796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in doctors' and nurses' assessments of hospital culture and their views about computerised order entry systems.
    Callen J; Braithwaite J; Westbrook J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():15-20. PubMed ID: 18487701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nurses and computers. An international perspective on nurses' requirements.
    Bond CS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):228-32. PubMed ID: 17911712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A care revolution. Interview by Lynne Pearce.
    Stuttle B
    Nurs Stand; 2009 Feb 18-24; 23(24):19-21. PubMed ID: 19275015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infoway's EHR user engagement strategy.
    Nagle LM
    Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont); 2007; 20(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 17619593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurses and clinical technology: sources of resistance and strategies for acceptance.
    Kirkley D; Stein M
    Nurs Econ; 2004; 22(4):216-22, 195. PubMed ID: 15382401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectators & spectacles: nurses, midwives and visuality.
    Barnard AG; Sinclair M
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Sep; 55(5):578-86. PubMed ID: 16907789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.