These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Histologic and clinical evaluation for maxillary sinus augmentation using macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate in human. Lee JH; Jung UW; Kim CS; Choi SH; Cho KS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):767-71. PubMed ID: 18705808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ridge augmentation and maxillary sinus grafting with a biphasic calcium phosphate: histologic and histomorphometric observations. Friedmann A; Dard M; Kleber BM; Bernimoulin JP; Bosshardt DD Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 19453566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Handt S; Edelhoff D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11280359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical histology of microimplants placed in two different biomaterials. Lindgren C; Sennerby L; Mordenfeld A; Hallman M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1093-100. PubMed ID: 20162114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histomorphometric comparison of a biphasic bone ceramic to anorganic bovine bone for sinus augmentation: 6- to 8-month postsurgical assessment of vital bone formation. A pilot study. Froum SJ; Wallace SS; Cho SC; Elian N; Tarnow DP Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Jun; 28(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 18605603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of Straumann Bone Ceramic in a maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure: a clinical, radiological, histological and histomorphometric evaluation with a 6-month healing period. Frenken JW; Bouwman WF; Bravenboer N; Zijderveld SA; Schulten EA; ten Bruggenkate CM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 19958374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting. Froum SJ; Wallace SS; Elian N; Cho SC; Tarnow DP Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 17243327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation. John HD; Wenz B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 15101590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Tawil G; Mawla M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Schlegel KA; Fichtner G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Wiltfang J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic results from a human implant retrieved due to fracture 5 years after insertion in a sinus augmented with anorganic bovine bone. Iezzi G; Scarano A; Mangano C; Cirotti B; Piattelli A J Periodontol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):192-8. PubMed ID: 18166111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann® BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Schmitt CM; Doering H; Schmidt T; Lutz R; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May; 24(5):576-85. PubMed ID: 22324456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are culture-expanded autogenous bone cells a clinically reliable option for sinus grafting? Fuerst G; Strbac GD; Vasak C; Tangl S; Leber J; Gahleitner A; Gruber R; Watzek G Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19077153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sinus bone graft using new alloplastic bone graft material (Osteon)-II: clinical evaluation. Bae JH; Kim YK; Kim SG; Yun PY; Kim JS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):e14-20. PubMed ID: 20219580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study. Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone and composite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation. Galindo-Moreno P; Moreno-Riestra I; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; Aguilar M; Wang HL; O'Valle F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 19845707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]