These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1870647)

  • 1. Fetal protection and employment discrimination--the Johnson Controls case.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Sep; 325(10):740-3. PubMed ID: 1870647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal protection policies.
    Kellner RC; Warbasse BW
    Healthspan; 1990 Dec; 7(11):18-20. PubMed ID: 10108666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Rights and protection of the pregnant woman today in France].
    Ponte C
    Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2006 Dec; (233):23-6. PubMed ID: 17236378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal protection policies in the United States.
    Scialli AR
    Semin Perinatol; 1993 Feb; 17(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 8446918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's job rights collide with fears of birth defects.
    Kilborn PT
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Sep; ():1, 28. PubMed ID: 11646784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal protection and freedom of contract.
    Paul EF
    Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 11652079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal protection policies: a method of safeguarding fetuses or a way of limiting women in the workplace?
    Hoffman H
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Jul; 23(7):193-207, 213, 224. PubMed ID: 10105492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can employers exclude women to protect children?
    Becker ME
    JAMA; 1990 Oct 24-31; 264(16):2113-7. PubMed ID: 2214080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 Mar; 111():1196-217. PubMed ID: 12041279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A reallocation of rights in industries with reproductive health hazards.
    Robinson JC; Giacomini MK
    Milbank Q; 1992; 70(4):587-603. PubMed ID: 1435627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maternity rights advice.
    Wade J
    Mod Midwife; 1997 Aug; 7(8):9-11. PubMed ID: 9348858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Firing the woman to protect the fetus: the reconciliation of fetal protection with employment opportunity goals under Title VII.
    Williams WW
    Georgetown Law J; 1981 Feb; 69(3):641-704. PubMed ID: 11649426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender discrimination in the medical community.
    Scott AK
    Update; 1995 Jul; 11(2):E1. PubMed ID: 16130241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal exclusion policies and gendered constructions of suitable work.
    Draper E
    Soc Probl; 1993 Feb; 40(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 11652221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
    Buss E
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
    Andrade VM
    Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law.
    Peach LJ
    J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women vs. Wal-Mart.
    Daniels C
    Fortune; 2003 Jul; 148(2):78-80, 82. PubMed ID: 12884675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnancy and return to work discrimination.
    Aust Nurs Midwifery J; 2014 May; 21(10):9. PubMed ID: 24945047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facing reality: the Pregnancy Discrimination Act falls short for women undergoing infertility treatment.
    Cushing K
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2010; 40(4):1697-731. PubMed ID: 21280392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.