BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18707288)

  • 1. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations.
    Kingsolver JG; Hoekstra HE; Hoekstra JM; Berrigan D; Vignieri SN; Hill CE; Hoang A; Gibert P; Beerli P
    Am Nat; 2001 Mar; 157(3):245-61. PubMed ID: 18707288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection?
    Kingsolver JG; Diamond SE
    Am Nat; 2011 Mar; 177(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 21460543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection.
    Hersch EI; Phillips PC
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):479-85. PubMed ID: 15119432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural selection, evolvability and bias due to environmental covariance in the field in an annual plant.
    Winn AA
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Sep; 17(5):1073-83. PubMed ID: 15312079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice.
    Stinchcombe JR; Rutter MT; Burdick DS; Tiffin P; Rausher MD; Mauricio R
    Am Nat; 2002 Oct; 160(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 18707526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of continent-wide patterns of sexual selection in a passerine bird.
    Møller AP; Chabi Y; Cuervo JJ; De Lope F; Kilpimaa J; Kose M; Matyjasiak P; Pap PL; Saino N; Sakraoui R; Schifferli L; von Hirschheydt J
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):856-68. PubMed ID: 16739465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Natural selection reduces energy metabolism in the garden snail, helix aspersa (cornu aspersum).
    Artacho P; Nespolo RF
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):1044-50. PubMed ID: 19236475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimates of the average strength of natural selection are not inflated by sampling error or publication bias.
    Knapczyk FN; Conner JK
    Am Nat; 2007 Oct; 170(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 17891729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing?
    Stinchcombe JR; Agrawal AF; Hohenlohe PA; Arnold SJ; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2435-40. PubMed ID: 18616573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breeding resource distribution affects selection gradients on male phenotypic traits: experimental study on lifetime reproductive success in the bitterling fish (Rhodeus amarus).
    Reichard M; Ondracková M; Bryjová A; Smith C; Bryja J
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):377-90. PubMed ID: 19215290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild.
    Siepielski AM; DiBattista JD; Carlson SM
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Nov; 12(11):1261-76. PubMed ID: 19740111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating and visualizing fitness surfaces using mark-recapture data.
    Gimenez O; Grégoire A; Lenormand T
    Evolution; 2009 Dec; 63(12):3097-105. PubMed ID: 19656185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter- and intrasexual variation in aging patterns across reproductive traits in a wild red deer population.
    Nussey DH; Kruuk LE; Morris A; Clements MN; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH
    Am Nat; 2009 Sep; 174(3):342-57. PubMed ID: 19653847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild.
    Hoekstra HE; Hoekstra JM; Berrigan D; Vignieri SN; Hoang A; Hill CE; Beerli P; Kingsolver JG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(16):9157-60. PubMed ID: 11470913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MEASURES OF PHENOTYPIC SELECTION ARE BIASED BY PARTIAL INBREEDING.
    Willis JH
    Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1501-1511. PubMed ID: 28565696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variation in acoustic signalling traits exhibits footprints of sexual selection.
    Reinhold K
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):738-45. PubMed ID: 20840596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical genetics of an annual plant, Impatiens capensis. II. Natural selection.
    Mitchell-Olds T; Bergelson J
    Genetics; 1990 Feb; 124(2):416-21. PubMed ID: 2307362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimates of natural selection in a salmon population in captive and natural environments.
    Ford MJ; Hard JJ; Boelts B; LaHood E; Miller J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):783-94. PubMed ID: 18577092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating fluctuating selection in age-structured populations.
    Engen S; Saether BE; Kvalnes T; Jensen H
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1487-99. PubMed ID: 22725602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 4000 years of phenotypic change in an island bird: heterogeneity of selection over three microevolutionary timescales.
    Clegg SM; Frentiu FD; Kikkawa J; Tavecchia G; Owens IP
    Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2393-410. PubMed ID: 18540948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.