328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18707696)
1. Outcomes following active surveillance of men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed in the prostate specific antigen era.
Ercole B; Marietti SR; Fine J; Albertsen PC
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1336-9; discussion 1340-1. PubMed ID: 18707696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database.
Barocas DA; Cowan JE; Smith JA; Carroll PR;
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1330-4; discussion 1334-5. PubMed ID: 18707731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention: walking the line between overtreatment for indolent disease and undertreatment for aggressive disease.
Klotz LH
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():53-7; discussion 101-2. PubMed ID: 15780167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.
Harlan SR; Cooperberg MR; Elkin E; Lubeck DP; Meng M; Mehta SS; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1804-7. PubMed ID: 14532780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of prostate cancer for young men with a prostate specific antigen less than their age specific median.
Loeb S; Nadler RB; Roehl KA; Antenor JA; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1745-8. PubMed ID: 17437803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 13-year outcomes following treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer in a population based cohort.
Albertsen PC; Hanley JA; Penson DF; Barrows G; Fine J
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):932-6. PubMed ID: 17296379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty and quality of life among men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer in the United States and Ireland.
Hegarty JM; Wallace M; Comber H
Am J Mens Health; 2008 Jun; 2(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 19477777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk stratification and validation of prostate specific antigen density as independent predictor of progression in men with low risk prostate cancer during active surveillance.
San Francisco IF; Werner L; Regan MM; Garnick MB; Bubley G; DeWolf WC
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):471-6. PubMed ID: 21167525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Staging saturation biopsy in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance protocol.
Abouassaly R; Lane BR; Jones JS
Urology; 2008 Apr; 71(4):573-7. PubMed ID: 18387385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: has the time finally come?
Aragon-Ching JB
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jun; 28(16):e265-6; author reply e267. PubMed ID: 20406916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial comment on: Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications.
Albertson PC
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1331-2. PubMed ID: 19286304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate specific antigen velocity in men with total prostate specific antigen less than 4 ng/ml.
Loeb S; Roehl KA; Nadler RB; Yu X; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2348-52; discussion 2352-3. PubMed ID: 17936844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of prostate cancer via biopsy in the Medicare-SEER population during the PSA era.
Welch HG; Fisher ES; Gottlieb DJ; Barry MJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Sep; 99(18):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17848671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of obesity on the diagnosis of prostate cancer using a modern extended biopsy scheme.
Pruthi RS; Swords K; Schultz H; Carson CC; Wallen EM
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):574-7; discussion 578. PubMed ID: 19084847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Editorial comment on: Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications.
Aus G
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1331. PubMed ID: 19286303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Total prostate specific antigen stability confirmed after long-term storage of serum at -80C.
Reed AB; Ankerst DP; Leach RJ; Vipraio G; Thompson IM; Parekh DJ
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):534-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 18550121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gleason score 7 screen-detected prostate cancers initially managed expectantly: outcomes in 50 men.
van den Bergh RC; Roemeling S; Roobol MJ; Aus G; Hugosson J; Rannikko AS; Tammela TL; Bangma CH; Schröder FH
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(11):1472-7. PubMed ID: 19154509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immunomagnetic quantification of circulating tumor cells as a prognostic factor of androgen deprivation responsiveness in patients with hormone naive metastatic prostate cancer.
Okegawa T; Nutahara K; Higashihara E
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1342-7. PubMed ID: 18707699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
