431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18707717)
1. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade.
Yanke BV; Lallas CD; Pagnani C; McGinnis DE; Bagley DH
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1397-402. PubMed ID: 18707717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience.
Mufarrij PW; Woods M; Shah OD; Palese MA; Berger AD; Thomas R; Stifelman MD
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1391-6. PubMed ID: 18707739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group.
Lucas SM; Sundaram CP; Wolf JS; Leveillee RJ; Bird VG; Aziz M; Pautler SE; Luke P; Erdeljan P; Baldwin DD; Ebrahimi K; Nadler RB; Rebuck D; Thomas R; Lee BR; Boylu U; Figenshau RS; Munver R; Averch TD; Gayed B; Shalhav AL; Gundeti MS; Castle EP; Anderson JK; Duffey BG; Landman J; Okhunov Z; Wong C; Strom KH
J Urol; 2012 Feb; 187(2):522-7. PubMed ID: 22177178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction on diuretic renogram--should minimally invasive pyeloplasty be offered to symptomatic patients?
Ozayar A; Friedlander JI; Shakir NA; Gahan JC; Cadeddu JA; Morgan MS
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1278-82. PubMed ID: 25444983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Skeldon S; Dave S; Bagli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL; Farhat WA
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost Analysis of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
Jacobs BL; Seelam R; Lai JC; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 27927021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Management of Adult UPJ Obstruction.
Strother MC; Mucksavage P
Curr Urol Rep; 2016 May; 17(5):39. PubMed ID: 26968419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: University of Miami experience with the daVinci Surgical System.
Siddiq FM; Leveillee RJ; Villicana P; Bird VG
J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 15865533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical modifications for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Mendez-Torres F; Woods M; Thomas R
J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 15865534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technique and results in 80 consecutive patients.
Castillo OA; Cabrera W; Aleman E; Vidal-Mora I; Yañez R
Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Mar; 38(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 23910728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults.
Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 27936909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Pardalidis NP; Papatsoris AG; Kosmaoglou EV
J Urol; 2002 Nov; 168(5):1937-40; discussion 1940. PubMed ID: 12394680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
