BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18708862)

  • 1. Using a contrast-enhanced imaging sequence at 3-minute delay in 3-T magnetic resonance imaging for acute infarct evaluation.
    Comte A; Kastler B; Laborie L; Hadjidekov G; Meneveau N; Boulahdour H
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):669-75. PubMed ID: 18708862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multidetector computed tomography in reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Assessment of infarct size and no-reflow in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jacquier A; Boussel L; Amabile N; Bartoli JM; Douek P; Moulin G; Paganelli F; Saeed M; Revel D; Croisille P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Nov; 43(11):773-81. PubMed ID: 18923256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low dose gadobenate dimeglumine for imaging of chronic myocardial infarction in comparison with standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine.
    Bauner KU; Reiser MF; Huber AM
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Feb; 44(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 19077911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging.
    Nieman K; Shapiro MD; Ferencik M; Nomura CH; Abbara S; Hoffmann U; Gold HK; Jang IK; Brady TJ; Cury RC
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 18372464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D and 2D delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for detection of myocardial infarction: preclinical and clinical results.
    Peukert D; Laule M; Taupitz M; Kaufels N; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):788-94. PubMed ID: 17574129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-energy computed tomography for the detection of late enhancement in reperfused chronic infarction: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology in a porcine model.
    Deseive S; Bauer RW; Lehmann R; Kettner M; Kaiser C; Korkusuz H; Tandi C; Theisen A; Schächinger V; Schoepf UJ; Vogl TJ; Kerl JM
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):450-6. PubMed ID: 21427592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced CMR early after acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a regional STEMI network: results of the "Herzinfarktverbund Essen".
    Bruder O; Breuckmann F; Jensen C; Jochims M; Naber CK; Barkhausen J; Erbel R; Sabin GV;
    Herz; 2008 Mar; 33(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 18344033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Myocardial SPECT perfusion defect size compared to infarct size by delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute or chronic infarction.
    Hedström E; Palmer J; Ugander M; Arheden H
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Nov; 24(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 15522048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging.
    Lund GK; Stork A; Saeed M; Bansmann MP; Gerken JH; Müller V; Mester J; Higgins CB; Adam G; Meinertz T
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 15166320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T using 0.15mmol/kg of contrast agent for the assessment of chronic myocardial infarction.
    Yang J; Ma H; Liu J; Wang C; Shi Y; Xie H; Huo F; Liu F; Lin K
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):778-82. PubMed ID: 24565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of microvascular obstruction and prediction of short-term remodeling after acute myocardial infarction: cardiac MR imaging study.
    Nijveldt R; Hofman MB; Hirsch A; Beek AM; Umans VA; Algra PR; Piek JJ; van Rossum AC
    Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):363-70. PubMed ID: 19164698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.
    Mahnken AH; Koos R; Katoh M; Wildberger JE; Spuentrup E; Buecker A; Günther RW; Kühl HP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2042-7. PubMed ID: 15963407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging with gadoversetamide contrast for the detection and assessment of myocardial infarction: an international, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized trial.
    Kim RJ; Albert TS; Wible JH; Elliott MD; Allen JC; Lee JC; Parker M; Napoli A; Judd RM;
    Circulation; 2008 Feb; 117(5):629-37. PubMed ID: 18212288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual scoring and quantitative planimetry methods for estimation of global infarct size on delayed enhanced cardiac MRI and validation with myocardial enzymes.
    Mewton N; Revel D; Bonnefoy E; Ovize M; Croisille P
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 19962260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of late iodine-enhancement dual-energy computed tomography for the detection of chronic myocardial infarction compared with late gadolinium-enhancement 3-T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wichmann JL; Bauer RW; Doss M; Stock W; Lehnert T; Bodelle B; Frellesen C; Vogl TJ; Kerl JM
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):851-6. PubMed ID: 23907104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tissue characterization of myocardial infarction using T1rho: influence of contrast dose and time of imaging after contrast administration.
    Huber S; Muthupillai R; Lambert B; Pereyra M; Napoli A; Flamm SD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1040-6. PubMed ID: 16972231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI evaluation of microvascular obstruction in experimental reperfused acute myocardial infarction using a T1 and T2 preparation pulse sequence.
    Yang Y; Foltz WD; Graham JJ; Detsky JS; Dick AJ; Wright GA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1486-92. PubMed ID: 17968957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of acute myocardial infarction using MDCT after percutaneous coronary intervention: comparison with MRI.
    Boussel L; Ribagnac M; Bonnefoy E; Staat P; Elicker BM; Revel D; Douek P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 18647915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved evaluation of myocardial perfusion and viability with the magnetic resonance blood pool contrast agent p792 in a nonreperfused porcine infarction model.
    Peukert D; Kaufels N; Laule M; Schnorr J; Carme S; Farr T; Schönenberger E; Taupitz M; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Apr; 42(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 17351432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of myocardial viability in a reperfused porcine model: evaluation of different MSCT contrast protocols in acute and subacute infarct stages in comparison with MRI.
    Brodoefel H; Reimann A; Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Ohmer M; Miller S; Schroeder S; Claussen C; Scheule A; Kopp AF
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 17414768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.