191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18709047)
1. An audit of colon cancer data on the New Zealand Cancer Registry.
Cunningham R; Sarfati D; Hill S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2008 Aug; 121(1279):46-56. PubMed ID: 18709047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of New Zealand Cancer Registry data with an independent lung cancer audit.
Stevens W; Stevens G; Kolbe J; Cox B
N Z Med J; 2008 Jun; 121(1276):29-41. PubMed ID: 18574507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can cancer centres in New Zealand help the cancer registry generate survival data? A pilot study in prostate cancer.
Evans TK; Lamb DS; Cornes DA; Fraser J; Johnson CA; Hamilton DA
N Z Med J; 2002 May; 115(1154):246-7. PubMed ID: 12117178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and completeness of the New Zealand Cancer Registry for staging of invasive breast cancer.
Seneviratne S; Campbell I; Scott N; Shirley R; Peni T; Lawrenson R
Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 38(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 25037979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of registry data: agreement between cancer records in an end-stage kidney disease registry (voluntary reporting) and a cancer register (statutory reporting).
Webster AC; Supramaniam R; O'Connell DL; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Jun; 15(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 20609104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colon cancer management in New Zealand: 1996-2003.
Cunningham R; Sarfati D; Hill S; Dennett E; O'Donnell A
N Z Med J; 2009 May; 122(1294):51-60. PubMed ID: 19465947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Completeness and accuracy of registration of colorectal cancer in Finland.
Kyllönen LE; Teppo L; Lehtonen M
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1987; 76(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 3434988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Childhood cancer registration in New Zealand: A registry collaboration to assess and improve data quality.
Ballantine KR; Hanna S; Macfarlane S; Bradbeer P; Teague L; Hunter S; Cross S; Skeen J
Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 55():104-109. PubMed ID: 29902672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can we rely on public data as a source of information for cancer registry in developing countries?
Semnani S; Kabir MJ; Besharat S; Abdolahi N; Danesh A; Roshandel D
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 16(3):147-9. PubMed ID: 16245225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Capturing tumour stage in a cancer information database.
Evans WK; Crook J; Read D; Morriss J; Logan DM
Cancer Prev Control; 1998 Dec; 2(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 10470461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer survival analysis in Hamburg 1995-2003: assessing the data quality within a population-based registry.
Nennecke AL; Hentschel S; Reintjes R
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18607873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary bone tumours of the shoulder: an audit of the Leeds Regional Bone Tumour Registry.
Barlow IW; Newman RJ
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1994 Feb; 39(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 7515432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osteosarcoma in New Zealand: an outcome study comparing survival rates between 1981-1987 and 1994-1999.
Curry H; Horne G; Devane P; Tobin H
N Z Med J; 2006 Sep; 119(1242):U2234. PubMed ID: 16998576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods of a national colorectal cancer cohort study: the PIPER Project.
Firth MJ; Sharples KJ; Hinder VA; Macapagal J; Sarfati D; Derrett SL; Hill AG; Brown C; Reid PM; Lawrenson RA; Atmore C; Keating JP; Jeffery M; Secker AH; De Groot C; Jackson CG; Findlay MP
N Z Med J; 2016 Aug; 129(1440):25-36. PubMed ID: 27538037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit.
Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data quality of the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry: a pilot audit.
Gray NA; Mahadevan K; Campbell VK; Noble EP; Anstey CM
Nephrology (Carlton); 2013 Oct; 18(10):665-70. PubMed ID: 23841726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Data quality of a breast cancer database in Naples, Italy. Do the necessary conditions exist for implementing a disease registry?].
Agozzino E; Attena F; Di Palma MA; Simonetti A; Mastrogiacomo F
Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2007; 63(6):703-13. PubMed ID: 18216885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. International differences in survival from colon cancer: more effective care versus less complete cancer registration.
Prior P; Woodman CB; Collins S
Br J Surg; 1998 Jan; 85(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 9462395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement of diagnosis and its date for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors between medicare claims and cancer registry data.
Setoguchi S; Solomon DH; Glynn RJ; Cook EF; Levin R; Schneeweiss S
Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Jun; 18(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 17447148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. National Breast Cancer Audit: establishing a web-based data system.
Boult M; Cuncins-Hearn A; Tyson S; Kollias J; Babidge W; Maddern G
ANZ J Surg; 2005 Oct; 75(10):844-7. PubMed ID: 16176221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
