These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18709047)
1. An audit of colon cancer data on the New Zealand Cancer Registry. Cunningham R; Sarfati D; Hill S; Kenwright D N Z Med J; 2008 Aug; 121(1279):46-56. PubMed ID: 18709047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of New Zealand Cancer Registry data with an independent lung cancer audit. Stevens W; Stevens G; Kolbe J; Cox B N Z Med J; 2008 Jun; 121(1276):29-41. PubMed ID: 18574507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can cancer centres in New Zealand help the cancer registry generate survival data? A pilot study in prostate cancer. Evans TK; Lamb DS; Cornes DA; Fraser J; Johnson CA; Hamilton DA N Z Med J; 2002 May; 115(1154):246-7. PubMed ID: 12117178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and completeness of the New Zealand Cancer Registry for staging of invasive breast cancer. Seneviratne S; Campbell I; Scott N; Shirley R; Peni T; Lawrenson R Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 38(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 25037979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of registry data: agreement between cancer records in an end-stage kidney disease registry (voluntary reporting) and a cancer register (statutory reporting). Webster AC; Supramaniam R; O'Connell DL; Chapman JR; Craig JC Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Jun; 15(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 20609104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colon cancer management in New Zealand: 1996-2003. Cunningham R; Sarfati D; Hill S; Dennett E; O'Donnell A N Z Med J; 2009 May; 122(1294):51-60. PubMed ID: 19465947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Completeness and accuracy of registration of colorectal cancer in Finland. Kyllönen LE; Teppo L; Lehtonen M Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1987; 76(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 3434988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Childhood cancer registration in New Zealand: A registry collaboration to assess and improve data quality. Ballantine KR; Hanna S; Macfarlane S; Bradbeer P; Teague L; Hunter S; Cross S; Skeen J Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 55():104-109. PubMed ID: 29902672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can we rely on public data as a source of information for cancer registry in developing countries? Semnani S; Kabir MJ; Besharat S; Abdolahi N; Danesh A; Roshandel D Turk J Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 16(3):147-9. PubMed ID: 16245225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Capturing tumour stage in a cancer information database. Evans WK; Crook J; Read D; Morriss J; Logan DM Cancer Prev Control; 1998 Dec; 2(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 10470461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer survival analysis in Hamburg 1995-2003: assessing the data quality within a population-based registry. Nennecke AL; Hentschel S; Reintjes R Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18607873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary bone tumours of the shoulder: an audit of the Leeds Regional Bone Tumour Registry. Barlow IW; Newman RJ J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1994 Feb; 39(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 7515432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osteosarcoma in New Zealand: an outcome study comparing survival rates between 1981-1987 and 1994-1999. Curry H; Horne G; Devane P; Tobin H N Z Med J; 2006 Sep; 119(1242):U2234. PubMed ID: 16998576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods of a national colorectal cancer cohort study: the PIPER Project. Firth MJ; Sharples KJ; Hinder VA; Macapagal J; Sarfati D; Derrett SL; Hill AG; Brown C; Reid PM; Lawrenson RA; Atmore C; Keating JP; Jeffery M; Secker AH; De Groot C; Jackson CG; Findlay MP N Z Med J; 2016 Aug; 129(1440):25-36. PubMed ID: 27538037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit. Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data quality of the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry: a pilot audit. Gray NA; Mahadevan K; Campbell VK; Noble EP; Anstey CM Nephrology (Carlton); 2013 Oct; 18(10):665-70. PubMed ID: 23841726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Data quality of a breast cancer database in Naples, Italy. Do the necessary conditions exist for implementing a disease registry?]. Agozzino E; Attena F; Di Palma MA; Simonetti A; Mastrogiacomo F Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2007; 63(6):703-13. PubMed ID: 18216885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. International differences in survival from colon cancer: more effective care versus less complete cancer registration. Prior P; Woodman CB; Collins S Br J Surg; 1998 Jan; 85(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 9462395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement of diagnosis and its date for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors between medicare claims and cancer registry data. Setoguchi S; Solomon DH; Glynn RJ; Cook EF; Levin R; Schneeweiss S Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Jun; 18(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 17447148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. National Breast Cancer Audit: establishing a web-based data system. Boult M; Cuncins-Hearn A; Tyson S; Kollias J; Babidge W; Maddern G ANZ J Surg; 2005 Oct; 75(10):844-7. PubMed ID: 16176221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]