191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18709047)
21. Should total number of lymph nodes be used as a quality of care measure for stage III colon cancer?
Wang J; Kulaylat M; Rockette H; Hassett J; Rajput A; Dunn KB; Dayton M
Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 19300237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. De novo cancers arising in organ transplant recipients are associated with adverse outcomes compared with the general population.
Miao Y; Everly JJ; Gross TG; Tevar AD; First MR; Alloway RR; Woodle ES
Transplantation; 2009 May; 87(9):1347-59. PubMed ID: 19424035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Controversies in prostate cancer staging implementation at a tertiary cancer center.
Sexton T; Rodrigues G; Brecevic E; Boyce L; Parrack D; Lock M; D'Souza D
Can J Urol; 2006 Dec; 13(6):3327-34. PubMed ID: 17187696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The accuracy and completeness of childhood cancer registration in New Zealand.
Dockerty JD; Becroft DM; Lewis ME; Williams SM
Cancer Causes Control; 1997 Nov; 8(6):857-64. PubMed ID: 9427428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Survival in stage III colon cancer is independent of the total number of lymph nodes retrieved.
Tsikitis VL; Larson DL; Wolff BG; Kennedy G; Diehl N; Qin R; Dozois EJ; Cima RR
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Jan; 208(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19228501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tumor subsite location within the colon is prognostic for survival after colon cancer diagnosis.
Wray CM; Ziogas A; Hinojosa MW; Le H; Stamos MJ; Zell JA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Aug; 52(8):1359-66. PubMed ID: 19617745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cancer statistics: everything you wanted to know about the cancer registry data but were too afraid to ask.
Giles GG; Thursfield V
ANZ J Surg; 2004 Nov; 74(11):931-4. PubMed ID: 15550077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Monitoring indicators of health care quality by means of a hospital register of tumours.
Redondo M; Rivas-Ruiz F; Guzman-Soler MC; Labajos C
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 14(6):1026-30. PubMed ID: 19019095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Occupational bladder cancer in New Zealand: a 1-year review of cases notified to the New Zealand Cancer Registry.
Dryson E; Walls C; McLean D; Pearce N
Intern Med J; 2005 Jun; 35(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 15892763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characteristics of lung cancers and accuracy and completeness of registration in the New Zealand Cancer Registry.
Lawrenson R; Lao C; Brown L; Wong J; Middleton K; Firth M; Aitken D
N Z Med J; 2018 Jul; 131(1479):13-23. PubMed ID: 30048429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Australian and New Zealand study comparing laparoscopic and open surgeries for colon cancer in adults: organization and conduct.
Allardyce RA; Bagshaw PF; Frampton CM; Frizelle FA; Hewett PJ; Rieger NA; Smith S; Solomon MJ; Stevenson AR
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):840-7. PubMed ID: 18959634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The accuracy of ethnicity data in primary care and its impact on cardiovascular risk assessment and management--PREDICT CVD-8.
Riddell T; Lindsay G; Kenealy T; Jackson R; Crengle S; Bramley D; Wells S; Marshall R
N Z Med J; 2008 Sep; 121(1281):40-8. PubMed ID: 18797483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of clinical data in a population based vascular registry.
Laustsen J; Jensen LP; Hansen AK;
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Feb; 27(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 14718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identification of 12 or more lymph nodes in resected colon cancer specimens as an indicator of quality performance.
Dillman RO; Aaron K; Heinemann FS; McClure SE
Cancer; 2009 May; 115(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 19208427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
Parkin DM; Bray F
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of cancer registry and clinical data as predictors for breast cancer survival.
Seppänen J; Heinävaara S; Holli K; Hakulinen T
Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Dec; 19(10):1299-304. PubMed ID: 18752035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of ethnicity in cancer data: which Hispanics are we misclassifying?
Pinheiro PS; Sherman R; Fleming LE; Gomez-Marin O; Huang Y; Lee DJ; Penedo FJ
J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(2):42-6. PubMed ID: 19694116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Basingstoke Orthopaedic Database: a high quality accurate information system for audit.
Barlow IW; Flynn NA; Britton JM
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Nov; 76(6 Suppl):285-7. PubMed ID: 7598401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Colon cancer in Iceland 1955-2004. Study on epidemiology, histopathology and gender difference].
Snaebjörnsson P; Jónasson L; Jónsson T; Möller PH; Theodórs A; Jónasson JG
Laeknabladid; 2009 Jun; 95(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 19491407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of the NARCOMS registry: diagnosis.
Marrie RA; Cutter G; Tyry T; Campagnolo D; Vollmer T
Mult Scler; 2007 Jul; 13(6):770-5. PubMed ID: 17525097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
