These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18709500)

  • 1. Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.
    Gallace A; Soto-Faraco S; Dalton P; Kreukniet B; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 191(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 18709500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tactile remapping beyond space.
    Azañón E; Camacho K; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1858-67. PubMed ID: 20584190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No Evidence for a Role of Spatially Modulated α-Band Activity in Tactile Remapping and Short-Latency, Overt Orienting Behavior.
    Ossandón JP; König P; Heed T
    J Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 40(47):9088-9102. PubMed ID: 33087476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related potential evidence for a dynamic (re-)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual-tactile interactions.
    Ley P; Steinberg U; Hanganu-Opatz IL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1466-74. PubMed ID: 25879770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexibly weighted integration of tactile reference frames.
    Badde S; Röder B; Heed T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():367-74. PubMed ID: 25447059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual cueing of tactile search is coded in an anatomical reference frame.
    Assumpção L; Shi Z; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Apr; 44(4):566-577. PubMed ID: 29035073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent use of somatotopic and external reference frames in a tactile mislocalization task.
    Tamè L; Wühle A; Petri CD; Pavani F; Braun C
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():25-33. PubMed ID: 27816777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal congruency and visual capture in a visual elevation-discrimination task.
    Walton M; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 14579008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Maravita A; Holmes N
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):171-89. PubMed ID: 15477031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception.
    Soto-Faraco S; Ronald A; Spence C
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1077-94. PubMed ID: 15751467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit body representations and tactile spatial remapping.
    Longo MR; Mancini F; Haggard P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():77-87. PubMed ID: 26196650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining proprioception and touch to compute spatial information.
    Canzoneri E; Ferrè ER; Haggard P
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 232(4):1259-66. PubMed ID: 24468725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Somatosensory saccades reveal the timing of tactile spatial remapping.
    Overvliet KE; Azañón E; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Sep; 49(11):3046-52. PubMed ID: 21782835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Driver J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):148-69. PubMed ID: 15460922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.
    Schubert JTW; Badde S; Röder B; Heed T
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189067. PubMed ID: 29228023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.