These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Large sample approximations of probabilities of correct evolutionary tree estimation and biases of maximum likelihood estimation. Susko E Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011; 10():Article 10. PubMed ID: 21381435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visualizing conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods. Holland B; Delsuc F; Moulton V Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 15805011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Conditioned genome reconstruction: how to avoid choosing the conditioning genome. Spencer M; Bryant D; Susko E Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 17366135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Searching for convergence in phylogenetic Markov chain Monte Carlo. Beiko RG; Keith JM; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):553-65. PubMed ID: 16857650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Asymptotic Behavior of Bootstrap Support Values in Molecular Phylogenetics. Huang J; Liu Y; Zhu T; Yang Z Syst Biol; 2021 Jun; 70(4):774-785. PubMed ID: 33377913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data. Waddell PJ; Kishino H; Ota R Genome Inform; 2002; 13():82-92. PubMed ID: 14571377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The probability of correctly resolving a split as an experimental design criterion in phylogenetics. Susko E; Roger AJ Syst Biol; 2012 Oct; 61(5):811-21. PubMed ID: 22337142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of protein distance measures and tree-building methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction. Hollich V; Milchert L; Arvestad L; Sonnhammer EL Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2257-64. PubMed ID: 16049194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Stochastic search strategy for estimation of maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees. Salter LA; Pearl DK Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 12116596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Theoretical foundation of the balanced minimum evolution method of phylogenetic inference and its relationship to weighted least-squares tree fitting. Desper R; Gascuel O Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Mar; 21(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 14694080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Summarizing a posterior distribution of trees using agreement subtrees. Cranston KA; Rannala B Syst Biol; 2007 Aug; 56(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 17654363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. Gadagkar SR; Rosenberg MS; Kumar S J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2005 Jan; 304(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 15593277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Brinkmann H; van der Giezen M; Zhou Y; Poncelin de Raucourt G; Philippe H Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):743-57. PubMed ID: 16243762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Calculating the evolutionary rates of different genes: a fast, accurate estimator with applications to maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis. Bevan RB; Lang BF; Bryant D Syst Biol; 2005 Dec; 54(6):900-15. PubMed ID: 16282169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences. I. Four taxa with a molecular clock. Zharkikh A; Li WH Mol Biol Evol; 1992 Nov; 9(6):1119-47. PubMed ID: 1435238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Artifactual phylogenies caused by correlated distribution of substitution rates among sites and lineages: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Ruano-Rubio V; Fares MA Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 17366138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences. Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]