These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18709995)

  • 1. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality assurance of analytical methods to guarantee the reliability of medical decision levels for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2004 Jun; 52(6):548-51. PubMed ID: 15283171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Domestic and international trends concerning allowable limits of error in external quality assessment scheme].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 16026083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biological inter- and intra-individual variations of serum immunochemical constituents and their allowable limits of analytical error].
    Hosogaya S; Naito K; Sakamoto M; Osada M; Yatomi Y; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 1999 Sep; 47(9):875-80. PubMed ID: 10518426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
    Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Standardization of clinical laboratory data in Japan by the JAMT and JCCLS].
    Hosogaya S
    Rinsho Byori; 2009 Jun; 57(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 19621792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Procedure for accurate evaluation of laboratory data and its international trends].
    Kuwa K
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):531-9. PubMed ID: 16026081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory standardization from the patient's point of view.
    Hoeltge GA
    Rinsho Byori; 2009 Jun; 57(6):549-53. PubMed ID: 19621787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study on biological variation of haemostatic parameters in clinically healthy dogs.
    Wiinberg B; Jensen AL; Kjelgaard-Hansen M; Rojkjaer R; Johansson PI; Gade LP; Gram DX; Kristensen AT
    Vet J; 2007 Jul; 174(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 16815052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of analytical and biological variation on the clinical interpretation of seminal parameters.
    Castilla JA; Alvarez C; Aguilar J; González-Varea C; Gonzalvo MC; Martínez L
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Apr; 21(4):847-51. PubMed ID: 16361288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality specifications and allowable standards for validation of methods used in clinical biochemistry].
    Vassault A; Grafmeyer D; de Graeve J; Cohen R; Beaudonnet A; Bienvenu J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1999; 57(6):685-95. PubMed ID: 10572217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Estimate of uncertainty of measurements in clinical laboratories and in environmental, occupational, and preventive medicine].
    Patriarca M; Menditto A; Bettinelli M; Minoia C
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2004; 26(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 15270437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The use of laboratory data].
    Keller H
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1991 Dec; 121(50):1861-9. PubMed ID: 1759145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Establishment of working reference materials in laboratory medicine].
    Kuwa K
    Rinsho Byori; 2006 Sep; 54(9):940-6. PubMed ID: 17063876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring Analytical Quality: Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty.
    Westgard JO; Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 28153359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Recommendations for expressing uncertainty of measurement of quantitative results in laboratory medicine].
    Giroud C; Dumontet M; Vassault A; Braconnier F; Férard G;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2007; 65(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 17353174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Data quality and the interpretation of biological monitoring results].
    Manini P; Mutti A; Folesani G; Catalani S; Apostoli P
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2004; 26(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15584439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Traceability as a unique tool to improve standardization in laboratory medicine.
    Panteghini M
    Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):236-40. PubMed ID: 19863912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty of glucose in clinical chemistry.
    Berçik Inal B; Koldas M; Inal H; Coskun C; Gümüs A; Döventas Y
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1100():223-6. PubMed ID: 17460183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [There is difference between decision limits and reference intervals. Reference intervals are based on measurements in healthy individuals, decision limits on measurements in patients].
    Lindstedt G; Tryding N
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Jul 11-24; 104(28-29):2076-9. PubMed ID: 17702381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.