These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18710347)

  • 21. FlexTouch: a prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism with consistent high accuracy at low- (1 U), medium- (40 U), and high- (80 U) dose settings.
    Wielandt JO; Niemeyer M; Hansen MR; Bucher D; Thomsen NB
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1195-9. PubMed ID: 22027317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of insulin injection needles on patients' perceptions of pain, handling, and acceptability: a randomized, open-label, crossover study in subjects with diabetes.
    McKay M; Compion G; Lytzen L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Mar; 11(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 19267582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment for ease of use and preference of a new prefilled insulin pen (FlexTouch Degludec U100/U200) versus the SoloSTAR insulin pen by patients with diabetes and healthcare professionals.
    Pfützner A; Forst T; Niemeyer M; Bailey T
    Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2014 Sep; 11(9):1381-9. PubMed ID: 24921223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dosing accuracy of two insulin pre-filled pens.
    Asakura T; Seino H; Kageyama M; Yohkoh N
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 May; 24(5):1429-34. PubMed ID: 18400146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ease of use and preference of a new versus widely available prefilled insulin pen assessed by people with diabetes, physicians and nurses.
    Oyer D; Narendran P; Qvist M; Niemeyer M; Nadeau DA
    Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2011 Oct; 8(10):1259-69. PubMed ID: 21905942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. FlexPen for the delivery of insulin: accuracy, injection force and patient preference.
    Pfützner A
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 Mar; 6(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 19298158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in the dose accuracy of insulin pens.
    Hänel H; Weise A; Sun W; Pfützner JW; Thomé N; Pfützner A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2008 May; 2(3):478-81. PubMed ID: 19885213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of glide force characteristics between 2 prefilled insulin lispro pens.
    Rees TM; Lennartz AH; Ignaut DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):316-9. PubMed ID: 25591858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of the SoloSTAR insulin pen.
    Schwartz S; Vlajnic A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Oct; 10(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 18715210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens.
    Clark PE; Valentine V; Bodie JN; Sarwat S
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Jul; 26(7):1745-53. PubMed ID: 20482243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative device assessments: Humalog KwikPen compared with vial and syringe and FlexPen.
    Ignaut DA; Schwartz SL; Sarwat S; Murphy HL
    Diabetes Educ; 2009; 35(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 19783767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An evaluation of prefilled insulin pens: a focus on the Next Generation FlexPen(®).
    Davis EM; Sexson EL; Spangler ML; Foral PA
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2010; 3():41-50. PubMed ID: 22915920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus other disposable pens.
    Fischer JS; Edelman SV; Schwartz SL
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2008 Nov; 2(6):1157-60. PubMed ID: 19885306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dose accuracy of SoloSTAR and FlexPen as assessed in a clinical setting.
    Friedrichs A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Sep; 11(9):609-13. PubMed ID: 19764841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. FlexTouch® for the delivery of insulin: technical attributes and perception among patients and healthcare professionals.
    Bailey T; Campos C
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2012 May; 9(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 22471783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of the injection force of solostar® compared with other disposable insulin pen devices at constant volume flow rates.
    Carter AW
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):156-7. PubMed ID: 21303638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Injection force of reusable insulin pens: Novopen 4, Lilly Luxura, Berlipen, and ClikSTAR.
    Friedrichs A; Korger V; Adler S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1185-90. PubMed ID: 22027315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of intuitiveness, ease of use, and preference in two insulin pens.
    Asakura T; Jensen KH
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Mar; 3(2):312-9. PubMed ID: 20144362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Injection Technique and Pen Needle Design Affect Leakage From Skin After Subcutaneous Injections.
    Præstmark KA; Stallknecht B; Jensen ML; Sparre T; Madsen NB; Kildegaard J
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 26798083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection.
    Rini C; Roberts BC; Morel D; Klug R; Selvage B; Pettis RJ
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):533-545. PubMed ID: 30880448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.