151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18710440)
1. Contemporary imaging of patients with a renal mass: does size on computed tomography equal pathological size?
Kurta JM; Thompson RH; Kundu S; Kaag M; Manion MT; Herr HW; Russo P
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 18710440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative imaging in renal masses: does size on computed tomography correlate with actual tumor size?
Ateş F; Akyol I; Sildiroglu O; Kucukodaci Z; Soydan H; Karademir K; Baykal K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2010 Dec; 42(4):861-6. PubMed ID: 20148365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of radiographic and pathologic sizes of renal tumors.
Lee SE; Lee WK; Kim DS; Doo SH; Park HZ; Yoon CY; Hwang SI; Lee HJ; Choe G; Hong SK
World J Urol; 2010 Jun; 28(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 20119641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of radiographic and pathologic sizes of renal tumors.
Chen W; Wang L; Yang Q; Liu B; Sun Y
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 23683665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Discrepancy between radiological and pathological sizes of renal masses].
Huang JW; Dong BJ; Zhang J; Kong W; Xue W; Liu DM; Huang YR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 35(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 24119902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic vs surgical size of renal tumours after partial nephrectomy.
Herr HW
BJU Int; 2000 Jan; 85(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 10619938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Renal tumour size measured radiologically before surgery is an unreliable variable for predicting histopathological features: benign tumours are not necessarily small.
Remzi M; Katzenbeisser D; Waldert M; Klingler HC; Susani M; Memarsadeghi M; Heinz-Peer G; Haitel A; Herwig R; Marberger M
BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5):1002-6. PubMed ID: 17437434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [How accurate is the correlation between clinical and pathological TNM stages in renal tumours?].
Frommhold J; Jocham D; Doehn C
Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Jul; 42(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 21717400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrepancy between radiological and pathological size of renal masses.
Jeffery NN; Douek N; Guo DY; Patel MI
BMC Urol; 2011 Feb; 11():2. PubMed ID: 21342488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of radiographical imaging modalities for measuring the diameter of renal masses: is there a sizeable difference?
Mucksavage P; Kutikov A; Magerfleisch L; Van Arsdalen K; Wein AJ; Ramchandani P; Malkowicz SB
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E232-6. PubMed ID: 21348913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implications of computer tomography measurement in the management of renal tumours.
Mistry R; Manikandan R; Williams P; Philip J; Littler P; Foster CS; Parsons KF
BMC Urol; 2008 Nov; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18980699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How does the radiographic size of a renal mass compare with the pathologic size?
Schlomer B; Figenshau RS; Yan Y; Bhayani SB
Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 16904439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic size versus surgical size of renal masses: which is the true size of the tumor?
Alicioglu B; Kaplan M; Yurut-Caloglu V; Usta U; Levent S
J BUON; 2009; 14(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 19650172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal tumor size: comparison between computed tomography and surgical measurements.
Irani J; Humbert M; Lecocq B; Pires C; Lefèbvre O; Doré B
Eur Urol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 11275723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of radiographic renal cell carcinoma tumor volume utilizing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging compared with pathological tumor volume.
Jorns J; Thiel DD; Arnold ML; Diehl N; Cernigliaro JC; Wu KJ; Parker AS
Scand J Urol; 2014 Oct; 48(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 24990768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT fluoroscopy-guided renal tumour cutting needle biopsy: retrospective evaluation of diagnostic yield, safety, and risk factors for diagnostic failure.
Iguchi T; Hiraki T; Matsui Y; Fujiwara H; Sakurai J; Masaoka Y; Gobara H; Kanazawa S
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):283-290. PubMed ID: 28770407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness and safety of computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal cancer: a 14-year single institution experience in 203 patients.
Iannuccilli JD; Dupuy DE; Beland MD; Machan JT; Golijanin DJ; Mayo-Smith WW
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1656-64. PubMed ID: 26373755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chest computed tomography for staging renal tumours: validation and simplification of a risk prediction model from a large contemporary retrospective cohort.
Voss J; Drake T; Matthews H; Jenkins J; Tang S; Doherty J; Chan K; Dawe H; Thomas T; Kearley S; Manners J; Carter C; Al-Buheissi S; Klatte T
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):561-567. PubMed ID: 31955483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced CT in 100 clear cell renal cell cancers - an analysis of enhancement, tumour size, and survival.
Veeratterapillay R; Ijabla R; Conaway D; Haslam P; Soomro N; Heer R
Clin Radiol; 2015 Dec; 70(12):1357-61. PubMed ID: 26337011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathological stage does not alter the prognosis for renal lesions determined to be stage T1 by computerized tomography.
Roberts WW; Bhayani SB; Allaf ME; Chan TY; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):713-5. PubMed ID: 15711249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
