171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18710450)
1. Effect of firing rate on the performance of shock wave lithotriptors.
Pishchalnikov YA; McAteer JA; Williams JC
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1681-6. PubMed ID: 18710450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent assessment of a wide-focus, low-pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig.
Evan AP; McAteer JA; Connors BA; Pishchalnikov YA; Handa RK; Blomgren P; Willis LR; Williams JC; Lingeman JE; Gao S
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 17922871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of shock wave lithotripsy injury in the pig using a narrow focal zone lithotriptor.
Connors BA; McAteer JA; Evan AP; Blomgren PM; Handa RK; Johnson CD; Gao S; Pishchalnikov YA; Lingeman JE
BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(9):1376-85. PubMed ID: 22519983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.
Pishchalnikov YA; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Pishchalnikova IV; Vonderhaar RJ
J Endourol; 2006 Aug; 20(8):537-41. PubMed ID: 16903810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative measurements of acoustic emissions from cavitation at the surface of a stone in response to a lithotripter shock wave.
Chitnis PV; Cleveland RO
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1929-32. PubMed ID: 16642802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pretreatment with low-energy shock waves induces renal vasoconstriction during standard shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): a treatment protocol known to reduce SWL-induced renal injury.
Handa RK; Bailey MR; Paun M; Gao S; Connors BA; Willis LR; Evan AP
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1270-4. PubMed ID: 19154458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.
Duryea AP; Roberts WW; Cain CA; Tamaddoni HA; Hall TL
J Endourol; 2014 Jan; 28(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 23957846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced shockwave lithotripsy with active cavitation mitigation.
Alavi Tamaddoni H; Roberts WW; Hall TL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3275. PubMed ID: 31795655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cavitation-induced streaming in shock wave lithotripsy.
Pishchalnikov YA; McAteer JA
Proc Meet Acoust; 2013 Jun; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 32939227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.
Li G; Williams JC; Pishchalnikov YA; Liu Z; McAteer JA
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E871-7. PubMed ID: 22938566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.
Handa RK; McAteer JA; Connors BA; Liu Z; Lingeman JE; Evan AP
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E1041-7. PubMed ID: 22612388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suppressing bubble shielding effect in shock wave lithotripsy by low intensity pulsed ultrasound.
Wang JC; Zhou Y
Ultrasonics; 2015 Jan; 55():65-74. PubMed ID: 25173067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.
Zhou Y; Cocks FH; Preminger GM; Zhong P
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):349-54. PubMed ID: 15201809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bubble proliferation in the cavitation field of a shock wave lithotripter.
Pishchalnikov YA; Williams JC; McAteer JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL87-93. PubMed ID: 21877776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choosing a powerful lithotriptor.
Mishriki SF; Cohen NP; Baker AC; Wills MI; Whitfield HN; Feneley RC
Br J Urol; 1993 Jun; 71(6):653-60. PubMed ID: 8343889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhanced High-Rate Shockwave Lithotripsy Stone Comminution in an In Vivo Porcine Model Using Acoustic Bubble Coalescence.
Alavi Tamaddoni H; Roberts WW; Duryea AP; Cain CA; Hall TL
J Endourol; 2016 Dec; 30(12):1321-1325. PubMed ID: 27762629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of renal injury with a clinical dual head lithotriptor delivering 240 shock waves per minute.
Handa RK; McAteer JA; Evan AP; Connors BA; Pishchalnikov YA; Gao S
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):884-9. PubMed ID: 19095269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of frequency doubled double pulse Nd:YAG laser fiber proximity to the target stone on transient cavitation and acoustic emission.
Fuh E; Haleblian GE; Norris RD; Albala WD; Simmons N; Zhong P; Preminger GM
J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1542-5. PubMed ID: 17382775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles.
Yoshizawa S; Ikeda T; Ito A; Ota R; Takagi S; Matsumoto Y
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Aug; 47(8):851-60. PubMed ID: 19360448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of energy density and acoustic cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.
Loske AM
Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19819511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
