693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18710745)
1. Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.
Scales CD; Norris RD; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Peterson BL; Dahm P
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1463-7. PubMed ID: 18710745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
Scales CD; Norris RD; Keitz SA; Peterson BL; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. PubMed ID: 17296417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting quality and information consistency of randomized, controlled trials presented as abstracts at the American Urological Association annual meetings.
Turpen RM; Fesperman SF; Smith WA; Vieweg J; Dahm P
J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):249-53. PubMed ID: 20483151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials published in the urological literature.
Breau RH; Gaboury I; Scales CD; Fesperman SF; Watterson JD; Dahm P
J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1693-7. PubMed ID: 20299044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized controlled trials in pediatric urology: room for improvement.
Welk B; Afshar K; MacNeily AE
J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):306-9; discussion 309-10. PubMed ID: 16753430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Levels of evidence in the urological literature.
Borawski KM; Norris RD; Fesperman SF; Vieweg J; Preminger GM; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1429-33. PubMed ID: 17706710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward.
Tiruvoipati R; Balasubramanian SP; Atturu G; Peek GJ; Elbourne D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 16872940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy.
Anttila H; Malmivaara A; Kunz R; Autti-Rämö I; Mäkelä M
Pediatrics; 2006 Jun; 117(6):2222-30. PubMed ID: 16740868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Publications by the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Urology: the quality of research design and statistical methodology.
Afshar K; Jafari S; Seth A; Lee JK; MacNeily AE
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4 Suppl):1906-10. PubMed ID: 19695587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).
Tharyan P; Premkumar TS; Mathew V; Barnabas JP; Manuelraj
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 18807310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Can one be a urologist without being familiar with the methodology of therapeutic trials?].
Bergmann JF
Prog Urol; 1996 Apr; 6(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8777412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of the quality of clinical trials about therapeutic research using the standard of evidence-based medicine].
Chen F; Zeng YC; Wei HR
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 40(9):609-13. PubMed ID: 15500766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence-based urology: how does a randomized clinical trial achieve its designed goals?
Sadeghi Bazargani H; Hajebrahimi S
Urol J; 2011; 8(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 21656466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the evidence: the methodological and reporting quality of comparative observational studies of surgical interventions in urological publications.
Tseng TY; Breau RH; Fesperman SF; Vieweg J; Dahm P
BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(8):1026-31. PubMed ID: 19021602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: survey of output and quality of reporting.
Karri V
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2006; 59(8):787-96. PubMed ID: 16876074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics.
Dulai SK; Slobogean BL; Beauchamp RD; Mulpuri K
J Pediatr Orthop; 2007; 27(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 17585270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fecal incontinence: the quality of reported randomized, controlled trials in the last ten years.
Parés D; Norton C; Chelvanayagam S
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Jan; 51(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 18085335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
