These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18710777)

  • 21. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: Is the outcome different in children under 2 years of age?
    Vicentini FC; Dénes FT; Borges LL; Silva FA; Machado MG; Srougi M
    J Pediatr Urol; 2008 Oct; 4(5):348-51. PubMed ID: 18790418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.
    Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Farhat WA; Bägli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1693-8; discussion1698-9. PubMed ID: 18708220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reoperative laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: comparison with open surgery.
    Piaggio LA; Noh PH; González R
    J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1878-82. PubMed ID: 17437840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bilateral dismembered laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty via a transperitoneal 4-port approach.
    Schwab CW; Casale P
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):1091-3. PubMed ID: 16094066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: intermediate results.
    Tong Q; Zheng L; Tang S; Zeng F; Du Z; Mei H; Wu Z; Pu J; Ruan Q
    Urology; 2009 Oct; 74(4):889-93. PubMed ID: 19628268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outpatient laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Rubinstein M; Finelli A; Moinzadeh A; Singh D; Ukimura O; Desai MM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
    Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):41-3; discussion 43-4. PubMed ID: 15992881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program.
    Kennedy GD; Heise C; Rajamanickam V; Harms B; Foley EF
    Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):596-601. PubMed ID: 19300230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A minimal invasive surgical approach for children of all ages with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Subotic U; Rohard I; Weber DM; Gobet R; Moehrlen U; Gonzalez R
    J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Aug; 8(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 21802371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transmesenteric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Romero FR; Wagner AA; Trapp C; Permpongkosol S; Muntener M; Link RE; Kavoussi LR
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2526-9. PubMed ID: 17085149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prospective evaluation of health related quality of life for pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Parekh AD; Thomas JC; Trusler L; Ankerst DP; Deshpande JK; Adams MC; Pope JC; Brock JW
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2171-5; discussion 2175-6. PubMed ID: 18804796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contemporary trends in surgical correction of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: data from the nationwide inpatient sample.
    Nelson CP; Park JM; Dunn RL; Wei JT
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):232-6. PubMed ID: 15592083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients.
    Frasson M; Braga M; Vignali A; Zuliani W; Di Carlo V
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Mar; 51(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 18197453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: using reconstructive methods based on intraoperative findings.
    Kawa G; Tatsumi M; Hiura Y; Muguruma K; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
    Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1171-4. PubMed ID: 16984547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age.
    Metzelder ML; Schier F; Petersen C; Truss M; Ure BM
    J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):688-91. PubMed ID: 16407027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retroperitoneoscopic vs open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Valla JS; Breaud J; Griffin SJ; Sautot-Vial N; Beretta F; Guana R; Gelas T; Carpentier X; Leculee R; Steyaert H
    J Pediatr Urol; 2009 Oct; 5(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 19369118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The impact of surgical approach and urinary diversion on patient outcomes in pediatric pyeloplasty.
    Bayne AP; Lee KA; Nelson ED; Cisek LJ; Gonzales ET; Roth DR
    J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4 Suppl):1693-8. PubMed ID: 21862074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
    Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing open and pneumovesical approach for ureteric reimplantation in pediatric patients--a preliminary review.
    Chung PH; Tang DY; Wong KK; Yip PK; Tam PK
    J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Dec; 43(12):2246-9. PubMed ID: 19040945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
    Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Kojima Y; Sasaki S; Mizuno K; Tozawa K; Hayashi Y; Kohri K
    Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):472-6. PubMed ID: 19383038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.