These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. To be, or not to be? Medicare pilot project moves ahead; questions remain. Weissenstein E Mod Healthc; 1998 Nov; 28(45):8. PubMed ID: 10187328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Piloting does to EMRs. Physicians hope CMS' EHR bonus project portends a broader shift in reimbursement priorities. Raths D Healthc Inform; 2008 Feb; 25(2):38, 40. PubMed ID: 18320877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Anti-kickback law extends to marketers. Burgess K Provider; 1996 Oct; 22(10):55-6. PubMed ID: 10166314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Medicare outpatient clinical laboratory services payments: relative value scale approach. Gurny PA; Clopton TA Health Care Financ Rev; 1986; 8(2):45-52. PubMed ID: 10317880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. HME dealers await changes in reimbursement policy. Lutz S Mod Healthc; 1988 Mar; 18(10):40. PubMed ID: 10302259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Creating a mutually beneficial approach to CBD project. Duncan HL MLO Med Lab Obs; 2008 Mar; 40(3):63. PubMed ID: 18429555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Competitive bidding: where do clinical laboratories stand? Ayres KI MLO Med Lab Obs; 2007 Nov; 39(11):60, 47. PubMed ID: 18072684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Con: competitive bidding cannot work in the clinical laboratory. Blanchard MR Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2006 Jul; 20(4):E3. PubMed ID: 16867292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Medical home payment structure offered. Report issued in preparation of CMS demonstration project. Dis Manag Advis; 2008 Jul; 14(7):1-2, 6. PubMed ID: 18683595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Medicare HMO demos may resurface. Weissenstein E Mod Healthc; 1997 Jul; 27(30):22. PubMed ID: 10168829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Legally speaking: understanding CMS' latest changes to the anti-markup/purchased test rule. Wright R J Ark Med Soc; 2009 Sep; 106(3):64. PubMed ID: 19947017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Diminished quality "possible" under bid plan. Albertson D Med Prod Sales; 1986 Oct; 17(10):12-6, 61-6. PubMed ID: 10301093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]