280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18712312)
1. Molecular similarity concepts and search calculations.
Auer J; Bajorath J
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 453():327-47. PubMed ID: 18712312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches.
Eckert H; Bajorath J
Drug Discov Today; 2007 Mar; 12(5-6):225-33. PubMed ID: 17331887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.
Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Similarity search profiles as a diagnostic tool for the analysis of virtual screening calculations.
Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1275-81. PubMed ID: 15272835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrating structure- and ligand-based virtual screening: comparison of individual, parallel, and fused molecular docking and similarity search calculations on multiple targets.
Tan L; Geppert H; Sisay MT; Gütschow M; Bajorath J
ChemMedChem; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1566-71. PubMed ID: 18651695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of methods based on diversity and similarity for molecule selection and the analysis of drug discovery data.
Lam RL; Welch WJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 275():301-16. PubMed ID: 15141118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shannon entropy-based fingerprint similarity search strategy.
Wang Y; Geppert H; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1687-91. PubMed ID: 19583222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and evaluation of a novel class-directed 2D fingerprint to search for structurally diverse active compounds.
Eckert H; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2515-26. PubMed ID: 17125192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications.
Kitchen DB; Decornez H; Furr JR; Bajorath J
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2004 Nov; 3(11):935-49. PubMed ID: 15520816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual screening in lead discovery and optimization.
Jain AN
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2004 Jul; 7(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 15338948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping algorithms for molecular similarity analysis and ligand-based virtual screening: design of DynaMAD and comparison with MAD and DMC.
Eckert H; Vogt I; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1623-34. PubMed ID: 16859294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [An introduction to the computer-aided structure-based drug design--applications of bioinformatics to drug discovery].
Hirono S
Rinsho Byori; 2002 Jan; 50(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 11871136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fragment analysis in small molecule discovery.
Merlot C; Domine D; Church DJ
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2002 May; 5(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 12058614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of a high-throughput screening data set using potency-scaled molecular similarity algorithms.
Vogt I; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 17300172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computational methodologies for compound database searching that utilize experimental protein-ligand interaction information.
Tan L; Batista J; Bajorath J
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Sep; 76(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 20636330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction of a generally applicable method to estimate retrieval of active molecules for similarity searching using fingerprints.
Vogt M; Bajorath J
ChemMedChem; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1311-20. PubMed ID: 17562536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Random reduction in fingerprint bit density improves compound recall in search calculations using complex reference molecules.
Wang Y; Geppert H; Bajorath J
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Jun; 71(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 18466274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Similarity searching using 2D structural fingerprints.
Willett P
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 672():133-58. PubMed ID: 20838967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods for computer-aided chemical biology. Part 2: Evaluation of compound selectivity using 2D molecular fingerprints.
Vogt I; Stumpfe D; Ahmed HE; Bajorath J
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Sep; 70(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17718714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular fingerprint recombination: generating hybrid fingerprints for similarity searching from different fingerprint types.
Nisius B; Bajorath J
ChemMedChem; 2009 Nov; 4(11):1859-63. PubMed ID: 19714705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
