400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18712657)
1. [Comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and achromatic standard automated perimetry in patients with migraine without aura and controls].
Göbel K; Boyraz M; Schröder A; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Aug; 225(8):718-22. PubMed ID: 18712657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Visual field in patients with arterial hypertension].
Schröder A; Assali B; Rüfer F; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Oct; 220(10):689-94. PubMed ID: 14577035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in migraine.
Harle DE; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 May; 25(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 15854070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of cataract on the results of frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
Tanna AP; Abraham C; Lai J; Shen J
Ophthalmology; 2004 Aug; 111(8):1504-7. PubMed ID: 15288979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amiodarone and optic neuropathy.
Domingues MF; Barros H; Falcão-Reis FM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):277-82. PubMed ID: 15115448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
Chiseliţa D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Felletti M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
Sakai T; Matsushima M; Shikishima K; Kitahara K
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reliability of frequency-doubling perimetry in young children.
Blumenthal EZ; Haddad A; Horani A; Anteby I
Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 15019315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning effect of humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension.
Centofanti M; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; Orzalesi N; Vetrugno M; Manni G; Rossetti L
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 18794676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of driver distraction and low alcohol concentrations on useful field of view and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
Puell MC; Barrio A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 18081908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subclinical visual involvement in multiple sclerosis: a study by MRI, VEPs, frequency-doubling perimetry, standard perimetry, and contrast sensitivity.
Sisto D; Trojano M; Vetrugno M; Trabucco T; Iliceto G; Sborgia C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1264-8. PubMed ID: 15790888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency doubling technology perimetry after clear and yellow intraocular lens implantation.
Ueda T; Ota T; Yukawa E; Hara Y
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Nov; 142(5):856-8. PubMed ID: 17056369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
