These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18712657)

  • 1. [Comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and achromatic standard automated perimetry in patients with migraine without aura and controls].
    Göbel K; Boyraz M; Schröder A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Aug; 225(8):718-22. PubMed ID: 18712657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Visual field in patients with arterial hypertension].
    Schröder A; Assali B; Rüfer F; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Oct; 220(10):689-94. PubMed ID: 14577035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in migraine.
    Harle DE; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 May; 25(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 15854070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of cataract on the results of frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Tanna AP; Abraham C; Lai J; Shen J
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Aug; 111(8):1504-7. PubMed ID: 15288979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amiodarone and optic neuropathy.
    Domingues MF; Barros H; Falcão-Reis FM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):277-82. PubMed ID: 15115448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
    Chiseliţa D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Felletti M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
    Sakai T; Matsushima M; Shikishima K; Kitahara K
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of frequency-doubling perimetry in young children.
    Blumenthal EZ; Haddad A; Horani A; Anteby I
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 15019315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning effect of humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension.
    Centofanti M; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; Orzalesi N; Vetrugno M; Manni G; Rossetti L
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 18794676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of driver distraction and low alcohol concentrations on useful field of view and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Puell MC; Barrio A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 18081908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subclinical visual involvement in multiple sclerosis: a study by MRI, VEPs, frequency-doubling perimetry, standard perimetry, and contrast sensitivity.
    Sisto D; Trojano M; Vetrugno M; Trabucco T; Iliceto G; Sborgia C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1264-8. PubMed ID: 15790888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency doubling technology perimetry after clear and yellow intraocular lens implantation.
    Ueda T; Ota T; Yukawa E; Hara Y
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Nov; 142(5):856-8. PubMed ID: 17056369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.