These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18713678)

  • 61. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
    Lindenblatt G; Silny J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effects of stimulation duration on electrogustometric thresholds.
    Loucks CA; Doty RL
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Mar; 81(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15059677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparative tactile sensitivity of the fingertip and apical tongue using complex and pure tactile tasks.
    Miles BL; Van Simaeys K; Whitecotton M; Simons CT
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Oct; 194():515-521. PubMed ID: 29981764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A multi-channel stimulator and electrode array providing a rotating current whirlpool for electrical stimulation of wounds.
    Petrofsky J; Suh HJ; Fish A; Hernandez V; Abdo A; Collins K; Mendoza E; Yang TN
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 18821415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Intermittent stimulation delays adaptation to electrocutaneous sensory feedback.
    Buma DG; Buitenweg JR; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 17894276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Human tactile discrimination of curvature when contact area with the skin remains constant.
    Goodwin AW; Wheat HE
    Exp Brain Res; 1992; 88(2):447-50. PubMed ID: 1577116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Human tactile perception as a standard for artificial tactile sensing--a review.
    Dargahi J; Najarian S
    Int J Med Robot; 2004 Jun; 1(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 17520594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A functional-magnetic-resonance-imaging investigation of cortical activation from moving vibrotactile stimuli on the fingertip.
    Summers IR; Francis ST; Bowtell RW; McGlone FP; Clemence M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1033-9. PubMed ID: 19206877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. An initial study on lip perception of electrotactile array stimulation.
    Liu W; Tang H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 16586196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Psychophysical studies relevant to the design of a digital electrotactile speech processor.
    Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 2957405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effects of a 2-, 3- and 4-electrode stimulator design on current dispersion on the surface and into the limb during electrical stimulation in controls and patients with wounds.
    Petrofsky J; Lawson D; Prowse M; Suh HJ
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(6):485-97. PubMed ID: 19005963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effect of changes in finger skin temperature on vibrotactile perception threshold.
    Harazin B; Harazin-Lechowska A
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2007; 20(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 17932011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Some characteristics of the tactile recognition of patterns with raised dots].
    Tanaka K; Ifukube T; Yoshimoto C
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1982 Sep; 20(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 7182612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Polarity effect in electrovibration for tactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Nammi K; Agarwal AK; Tyler ME; Haase SJ; Beebe DJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):2047-54. PubMed ID: 17019869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Sensory afferent inhibition within and between limbs in humans.
    Bikmullina R; Bäumer T; Zittel S; Münchau A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):610-8. PubMed ID: 19136299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Electrocutaneous sensitivity: effects of skin temperature.
    Larkin WD; Reilly JP
    Somatosens Res; 1986; 3(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 3749663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Sensory detection thresholds are modulated across the cardiac cycle: evidence that cutaneous sensibility is greatest for systolic stimulation.
    Edwards L; Ring C; McIntyre D; Winer JB; Martin U
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 19207192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Electrotactile perception of scatterplots on the fingertips and abdomen.
    Haase SJ; Kaczmarek KA
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Mar; 43(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 15865140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Age-related changes in tactile spatial resolution from 6 to 16 years old.
    Bleyenheuft Y; Cols C; Arnould C; Thonnard JL
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2006; 23(3-4):83-7. PubMed ID: 17178543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Spatial discrimination learning of electrocutaneous stimuli.
    Weiss T; Walter K; Spohn D; Richter M; Torma F; Miltner WH
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Nov; 427(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 17931775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.