187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18714130)
1. Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.
Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Poga V; Louizi A; Kottou S; Koulentianos E
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 18714130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of mean glandular dose in a full-field digital mammography unit in Tabriz, Iran.
Alizadeh Riabi H; Mehnati P; Mesbahi A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):222-7. PubMed ID: 20823039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.
Lekatou A; Metaxas V; Messaris G; Antzele P; Tzavellas G; Panayiotakis G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30753684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
Asadollahzadeh N; Razavi S; Zare MH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Jun; 200(9):809-821. PubMed ID: 38811346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system.
Morán P; Chevalier M; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Vañó E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 15933140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose management software implementation in mammography.
Samara ET; Tsapaki V; Sramek D
Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():88-95. PubMed ID: 31765886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regression Analysis between the Different Breast Dose Quantities Reported in Digital Mammography and Patient Age, Breast Thickness, and Acquisition Parameters.
Dhou S; Dalah E; AlGhafeer R; Hamidu A; Obaideen A
J Imaging; 2022 Jul; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
Matsumoto M; Inoue S; Honda I; Yamamoto S; Ueguchi T; Ogata Y; Johkoh T
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in the Netherlands.
Zoetelief J; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; Jansen JT
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(7):1807-17. PubMed ID: 16552106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.
Jamal N; Ng KH; McLean D
Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):238-45. PubMed ID: 12711643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric evaluation of the mean glandular dose for mammography in Korean women: a preliminary report.
Oh KK; Hur J; Kim EK; Choo SS
Yonsei Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):863-8. PubMed ID: 14584104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards proposition of a diagnostic reference level for mammographic examination in the greater Khorasan Province, Iran.
Bahreyni Toossi MT; Zare H; Bayani Roodi Sh; Hashemi M; Akbari F; Malekzadeh M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 23209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposed DRLs for mammography in Switzerland.
Dupont L; Aberle C; Botsikas D; Ith M; Lima TVM; Menz R; Monnin P; Poletti PA; Presilla S; Schegerer A; Stoica LC; Trueb P; Sans Merce M
J Radiol Prot; 2024 May; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38530290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of mean glandular dose versus compressed breast thickness relationship for mammography.
Bor D; Tukel S; Olgar T; Toklu T; Aydin E; Akyol O
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):160-4. PubMed ID: 18420560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of mean glandular dose in diagnostic mammography in China.
Du X; Wang J; Yang CY; Zhou XF; Chen W; Cao XJ; Zhou YY; Le Yu N
Biomed Environ Sci; 2014 May; 27(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 24827723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
